440 positions on this site are linked to Glaucoma, out of 103,022 published in total. Each was published only after passing the same quality gate; being on this list is an association, not a diagnosis.
CDKN2B-AS1 · rs2157719
See detailed info → StandardBMP2 · rs6107845
See detailed info → StandardCDKN2B-AS1 · rs1333037
See detailed info → StandardCARD10 · rs6000762
See detailed info → StandardRAPSN · rs12419342
See detailed info → StandardCAV1 · rs10258482
See detailed info → StandardAFAP1 · rs4619890
See detailed info → StandardGMDS · rs11969985
See detailed info → SensitiveTBC1D21 · rs16958445
See detailed info → StandardDUSP1 · rs17658229
See detailed info → StandardNUP160 · rs747782
See detailed info → StandardGLCCI1 · rs59072263
See detailed info → StandardSCYL1 · rs17146964
See detailed info → StandardATOH7 · rs1900004
See detailed info → StandardCHEK2 · rs1547014
See detailed info → StandardEXOC2 · rs57111852
See detailed info → StandardCAV1 · rs2024211
See detailed info → StandardLOC154449 · rs2935072
See detailed info → StandardCADM2 · rs9284802
See detailed info → StandardGMDS · rs6914444
See detailed info →Showing 20 of 440 · page 21 of 22
One specific position in the genome (an rsID), explained in plain language with what published research has found it linked to, and how strong that link actually is.
The public GWAS Catalog, checked every twenty minutes, plus variants added manually after research review. Every one passes the same quality gate before publishing.
No. Listing reflects an association from published research, not a diagnosis or a cause. Most common variants shift probability modestly rather than determining an outcome.
Yes — the search box above matches gene symbols and rsIDs as well as trait names.