Ophthalmic

Glaucoma

Reviewed September 5, 2026

Glaucoma is a group of eye diseases that silently damage the optic nerve. A variant near SRBD1 has been linked to normal-tension glaucoma in Japanese cohorts, but evidence outside that population is thin.

What this condition connects to

Glaucoma Variant: rs3213787 rs3213787 Variant Variant: rs4236601 rs4236601 Variant Variant: rs10505100 rs10505100 Variant Variant: rs11710139 rs11710139 Variant Variant: rs12699251 rs12699251 Variant Variant: +434 more +434 more Variant Glaucoma Glaucoma Ophthalmic
Prevalence
Glaucoma affected an estimated 4.22 million adults in the United States as of 2022 — about 1.62% of adults — with roughly 1.49 million having vision-affecting glaucoma; an estimated half of people with glaucoma are unaware they have it. Normal-tension glaucoma specifically is reported to make up a comparatively larger share of open-angle glaucoma cases in Japanese and other East Asian populations than in European-ancestry populations.
Inheritance
Complex/polygenic for most common forms, including normal-tension glaucoma — rs3213787 near SRBD1 is a population-specific risk-modifying marker identified primarily in Japanese cohorts, not a single-gene cause. (Note: rare, distinct forms of congenital and juvenile-onset glaucoma can follow Mendelian inheritance patterns tied to specific genes such as MYOC or CYP1B1, but those are separate from the common adult-onset disease and variant discussed here.)

Glaucoma is not one single disease but a group of eye conditions that damage the optic nerve — the bundle of more than a million nerve fibers that carries visual information from the eye to the brain. Left untreated, that damage causes progressively worsening, permanent vision loss, usually starting at the edges of a person's visual field and, if it continues, closing in toward the center. Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, and it affects several million people in the United States alone, a number expected to rise substantially as the population ages.

The "Silent Thief of Sight"

Glaucoma has earned that nickname for a genuinely alarming reason: in its most common forms, it typically causes no pain and no noticeable symptoms until a significant amount of vision has already been lost. Peripheral vision fades so gradually, and the brain is so good at filling in the gaps using information from both eyes, that many people don't notice a problem until 40% or more of the relevant nerve fibers have already been damaged. As a result, a substantial share of people living with glaucoma don't yet know they have it — which is precisely why regular comprehensive, dilated eye exams (not just a vision-chart check) matter, especially for people with risk factors such as older age, a family history of glaucoma, or Black, Hispanic/Latino, or East Asian ancestry (each associated with elevated risk for different glaucoma subtypes).

The Main Types

Why Early Detection Is a Genuinely Preventive Story

Unlike some genetic conditions where a variant is simply informative, glaucoma is one of the clearer cases in medicine where early detection changes the outcome. Vision already lost to glaucoma cannot be restored — but with a comprehensive dilated eye exam, optic nerve imaging, and visual field testing, glaucoma can usually be caught well before a person notices any symptoms, and its progression can typically be slowed or halted with prescription eye drops, laser treatment, or surgery to lower eye pressure or otherwise protect the optic nerve. That combination — a disease that causes irreversible damage if ignored, but is genuinely manageable if caught — is exactly why eye care organizations emphasize routine screening, particularly for people with a family history or other risk factors.

The Genetics Discussed on This Page

A specific DNA marker, rs3213787, near a gene called SRBD1, was identified in a 2010 genome-wide genetic study of normal-tension glaucoma conducted by Japanese researchers, where it was associated with a meaningfully higher chance of NTG in that Japanese cohort. As discussed in the clinical detail section below, this finding has held up less consistently when tested in other populations — an important, honest caveat that doesn't diminish the value of understanding one's own genetic background, but does mean this particular marker should be read as a population-level research finding from a specific ancestry group rather than a universal or individually predictive test.

Beyond SRBD1: five more genome-wide studies behind this page

The SRBD1 finding above was the first genetic association held on this page, but it is far from the only one — this page's variants now come from six separate genome-wide studies, spanning intraocular pressure (IOP, the eye-internal fluid pressure that is the main modifiable risk factor for glaucoma) and open-angle glaucoma itself.

Gharahkhani et al. 2014, published back-to-back with a companion IOP study in the same journal issue, found common variants near ABCA1, AFAP1, and GMDS conferring risk of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

That companion paper, Hysi et al. 2014 from the International Glaucoma Genetics Consortium (IGGC), combined 18 cohorts totaling 35,296 multi-ancestry participants studying IOP directly and found four new IOP-associated loci — on chromosome 3q25.31 in FNDC3B, two on chromosome 9 (near ABCA1 and within ABO), and one on chromosome 11p11.2, the strongest of the four. This page's rs747782, in NUP160, is that chromosome-11 locus. A separate case-control analysis of 4,284 POAG cases and 95,560 controls found three of these four IOP loci also associated with glaucoma itself — direct evidence that IOP genetics feeds forward into glaucoma risk, which is why this page holds IOP variants at all rather than treating IOP as a separate trait. 132 of this page's variants come from this study.

Choquet et al. 2018 ran a multiethnic GWAS of POAG (the GERA cohort, replicated in and from UK Biobank) and found 24 significant loci, 14 of them novel, with 9 replicating across cohorts (near FMNL2, PDE7B, TMTC2, IKZF2, CADM2, DGKG, ANKH, EXOC2, and LMX1B). Two of those genes, FMNL2 and LMX1B, had functional follow-up support for an IOP-related role — in mice, certain Lmx1b mutations cause high eye pressure and POAG-like disease. The new loci explained the most additional variance in African-American participants (0.5-3.1%), a population underrepresented in earlier, largely European-ancestry glaucoma genetics.

Khawaja et al. 2018 combined UK Biobank (103,914 participants) with the earlier International Glaucoma Genetics Consortium data (29,578 participants) to study IOP specifically, finding 101 independent genome-wide-significant loci, 85 of them new. 53 of the 101 IOP loci were also associated with glaucoma itself in a separate 11,018-case, 126,069-control analysis — again showing IOP genetics and glaucoma genetics substantially overlap. People in the top decile of a combined allele score built from these loci had 5.6 times the odds of advanced glaucoma compared to the bottom decile.

Craig et al. 2020 took a different approach: rather than studying diagnosed glaucoma directly, the team analyzed optic nerve photographs from 67,040 UK Biobank participants and built a polygenic risk score (PRS) from the resulting loci. That score meaningfully stratifies real-world risk — people in its top decile reach the absolute risk of glaucoma that the bottom decile reaches ten years later, and face roughly 15 times the risk of advanced glaucoma (odds ratio 4.20 for the top 10% versus the rest). The same PRS also modifies how often a specific, well-known glaucoma-causing MYOC variant (p.Gln368Ter) actually goes on to cause disease — a concrete example of polygenic background changing the penetrance of a single strong-effect variant, rather than acting independently of it.

Ramdas et al. 2010 studied a different measurement entirely: the vertical cup-disc ratio (VCDR) — the proportion of the optic disc taken up by its central "cup," the single measurement a clinician actually reads off an eye exam to judge glaucomatous optic nerve damage. In 7,360 people, later replicated in 4,455 more across three further cohorts, the study found CDKN2B and SIX1 genome-wide-significant for VCDR specifically, alongside ATOH7 and CDC7 for a related measurement, optic disc area — and three of its loci were marginally associated with open-angle glaucoma itself. This page's rs2157719 sits in CDKN2B-AS1, the same 9p21 region as the paper's own finding, and rs8015152 sits in SIX6, in the same eye-development gene family as the paper's SIX1. Eleven of this page's variants come from this study.

Khor et al. 2011 ran the first Asian-based GWAS of optic disc area itself — the physical measurement VCDR is a ratio of — in 4,445 Singaporean people, meta-analysed with 9,326 more of Caucasian ancestry from Rotterdam. The study confirmed two known genes, ATOH7 and TGFBR3, and identified a novel locus, CARD10. This page's rs6000762, in CARD10, is the paper's own novel finding. Springelkamp et al. 2017 went further, meta-analysing intraocular pressure alongside optic disc parameters and validating results across multiple POAG case-control sets. It found 9 new regions for VCDR, 1 for intraocular pressure, 5 for optic nerve cup area, and 6 for disc area — and, using a zebrafish model, showed that the zebrafish counterpart of SIX6 alters expression of CDKN1A, a newly identified glaucoma gene. This page's rs34935520, in SIX6, is the same gene that zebrafish experiment validated. Eight of this page's variants come from these two optic-disc-area studies together.

A handful of smaller studies add further loci for specific glaucoma subtypes and populations represented in smaller numbers on this page. The field's largest assembly to date, a 2021 meta-analysis across ancestries (Gharahkhani et al.), found 127 open-angle glaucoma loci with consistent effects. None of this changes the picture above: glaucoma genetics is highly polygenic, no single locus is diagnostic, and a comprehensive eye exam — not a genetic test — remains how glaucoma is actually found and monitored.

Positions joined since this page was written

What this is The text above discusses the variants this page was written around. Since then the catalogue has joined 216 more positions to it, by shared trait or shared paper. They are listed here by the paper each came from; the text does not describe them, and each variant page carries that study's own record.

Han X et al. 2023, Nature genetics rs4769194 (LINC00540), rs17527016 (near LYPLA1P2), rs7972874 (near PTHLH), rs10257125 (near CAV1), rs1658436 (BICC1), rs4414666 (near MIR4778), rs17254069 (near RN7SKP155), rs280875 (near LINC02131), rs2218471 (LINC03082), rs13090630 (MECOM), rs11206194 (GLIS1), rs4689872 (AFAP1) and 85 more — PMID:37386247

Verma A et al. 2024, Science (New York, N.Y.) rs12869698 (LINC03082), rs2472496 (near ABCA1), rs8027468 (near ASB7), rs72778322 (LINC01376), rs9389370 (PDE7B), rs9311623 (ARHGEF3), rs10993828 (VAV2), rs158638 (near PSMC1P4), rs28464089 (AFAP1), rs144408824 (near PFN1P1), rs72759618 (PDZD2), rs11113070 (RFX4) and 43 more — PMID:39024449

Craig JE et al. 2020, Nature genetics rs6690264 (VPS13D), rs984586 (FLRT2), rs73153655 (TMTC2), rs62038917 (SALL1), rs2880364 (DCBLD2), rs66716938 (RIC8B), rs4864858 (GSX2), rs56031192 (GMDS), rs72852338 (STK38), rs35526343 (FENDRR), rs9651957 (RIC8B), rs8176662 (ABO) and 10 more — PMID:31959993

Gharahkhani P et al. 2021, Nature communications rs11710845 (LINC01214), rs1412829 (CDKN2B-AS1), rs61870251 (LHPP), rs34175429 (TXNRD2), rs938604 (AFAP1), rs1893261 (TLCD5), rs62521288 (FBXO32), rs17146835 (NDP), rs6667536 (LYPLAL1-DT), rs12540035 (CAV2), rs9819278 (CADM2), rs2491422 (TFAP2B-PKHD1) and 6 more — PMID:33627673

Sakaue S et al. 2021, Nature genetics rs1550437 (LOXL1), rs10987373 (LMX1B), rs2495850 (near PKHD1), rs4308305 (FNDC3B), rs11852134 (near AREL1), rs10120806 (CDKN2B-AS1), rs16845236 (FNDC3B), rs149002763 (near MTCYBP45) — PMID:34594039

Zhou W et al. 2022, Cell genomics rs62283809 (FNDC3B), rs7748159 (PDE7B-AS1), rs7636138 (CADM2), rs17833038 (AFAP1), rs147660927 (MTOR), rs6743072 (near PNPT1), rs13268581 (GTF2E2), rs13438572 (near CTTNBP2) — PMID:36777996

Xue Z et al. 2022, EBioMedicine rs6478746 (LMX1B-DT), rs782610 (near PNPT1), rs16841407 (AFAP1), rs12602519 (GAS7) — PMID:35841873

Luben RN et al. 2025, Nature communications rs11984688 (PXDNL), rs10215636 (near SEMA3A) — PMID:41238566

Khor CC et al. 2016, Nature genetics rs3739821 (DPM2) — PMID:27064256

Hauser MA et al. 2019, JAMA rs59892895 (APBB2) — PMID:31688885

In the news

2026-07-27 · Multi-Ancestry Genome-Wide Association with Fine-Mapping Identifies Novel Loci for Pigment Dispersion Syndrome and Pigmentary Glaucoma. Ophthalmology Glaucoma. 2026. DOI:10.1016/j.ogla.2026.07.008

Multi-ancestry study finds 4 genetic loci for pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma

Pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma -- a specific mechanism of ocular hypertension where pigment sheds from the iris and clogs the eye's drainage structures -- have had poorly defined genetics, especially outside European ancestry. Using the multi-ancestry All of Us Research Program (up to 572 cases and 37,808 controls with array genotyping, plus a separate whole-genome-sequencing cohort), this study found 4 genome-wide significant loci: near EPHA7 (a cell-cell signaling gene), within TYR (melanin synthesis, replicating prior studies), within LINC01138, and near OTX2. Statistical fine-mapping narrowed 3 of the 4 to single-variant 95% credible sets, and effect sizes were broadly consistent across ancestry groups -- a genuine multi-ancestry replication rather than a European-only finding. Lead variants showed regulatory evidence including reduced EPHA7 expression, pointing to both melanin production and cell adhesion/signaling pathways as mechanisms. This site's glaucoma page carries 216 variants; none of these 4 genes (EPHA7, TYR, LINC01138, OTX2) are currently among them, and this study's specific lead SNPs were not yet indexed in GWAS Catalog at the time of writing, so this entry documents the finding at the condition level.

2026-06-23 · A Whole-Genome Sequence Genome-Wide Association Study in All of Us Identifies a Novel Glaucoma Risk Locus in African Individuals. Ophthalmology Science. 2026. DOI:10.1016/j.xops.2026.101298

A glaucoma risk locus near CYP2A7 shows up only when African-ancestry genomes are analyzed on their own

Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) disproportionately affects people of African ancestry, yet most GWAS discovery has come from European cohorts. Using whole-genome sequencing data from the NIH All of Us program, this study ran separate GWAS within European, African and Latino/Admixed American ancestry groups (using both a relaxed diagnosis-code phenotype and a stricter one requiring evidence of glaucoma treatment), then cross-ancestry meta-analyses. Known POAG risk loci -- TMCO1, CDKN2B-AS1, GMDS -- replicated across ancestries with consistent effect sizes (OR 1.19-1.38), confirming the study's methodology. The new finding was ancestry-specific: a locus near CYP2A7 (rs76935404, OR=1.35) reached genome-wide significance only in the African-ancestry GWAS using the stricter phenotype definition -- it did not show up in the European or Latino groups, or in the combined cross-ancestry meta-analysis, meaning a purely European-derived risk model would have missed it entirely. This is a direct demonstration of why ancestry-stratified analysis matters, not just larger combined sample sizes. This site's glaucoma page carries 216 variants; CYP2A7 is not currently among them and represents a genuinely African-ancestry-specific addition to the page's mostly European-derived variant list.

2026-03-17 · Multi-ancestry genome-wide association study in All of Us for primary open-angle glaucoma. Scientific Reports. 2026. DOI:10.1038/s41598-026-43993-9

374,000-person glaucoma study finds three ancestries have almost entirely different new risk genes

Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) prevalence varies substantially by ancestry, and this study specifically tested whether its genetic architecture does too, rather than assuming one set of risk genes applies everywhere. Using 374,254 All of Us participants (4,305 POAG cases), it ran separate GWAS in European, African and Admixed American/Latino ancestry groups, then a cross-ancestry meta-analysis, finding 56 genome-wide significant variants including 6 novel loci overall. The striking result is how little overlap the novel loci had between ancestries: European ancestry found new loci near TUT4, RYK, MOXD1 and UBAP2 (alongside the already-known TMCO1); African ancestry found a completely different set -- TSPAN17, SLC16A7, LOC100506869, LINC02388, LOC107984606; and Admixed American/Latino ancestry found GATA5, FAM135B and LINC00871. Most ancestry-specific signals held up in the cross-ancestry meta-analysis, though several associations attenuated in the smaller Latino cohort. This directly demonstrates that POAG's genetic determinants differ meaningfully across populations -- a European-only or even a naively pooled GWAS would have missed most of what this study found. This site's glaucoma page carries 216 variants; none of these newly reported ancestry-specific genes are currently among them.

Clinical detail

Locus and variant. rs3213787 is an intronic single-nucleotide variant within SRBD1 (S1 RNA-binding domain 1) at chromosome 2p21.

Discovery study and population. The variant was identified by the Normal Tension Glaucoma Genetic Study Group of the Japan Glaucoma Society (Meguro A, et al., Ophthalmology 2010; PMID 20363506; GWAS Catalog accession GCST000645) in a genome-wide association study of 305 Japanese NTG cases versus 355 Japanese controls (East Asian ancestry, Japan). rs3213787 was among the two most strongly associated SNPs in that GWAS, with p = 2.5×10⁻⁹ and an odds ratio of 2.8 (95% CI 1.96–3.99) per copy of the associated allele; per GWAS Catalog, the associated allele frequency was approximately 0.81 in that dataset. The same study also implicated a second gene, ELOVL5. Because SRBD1 and ELOVL5 have been reported to participate in cell growth and apoptosis regulation, the authors proposed these pathways could plausibly relate to NTG pathophysiology independent of intraocular pressure, though the precise causal mechanism remains uncharacterized.

Replication is inconsistent outside Japanese cohorts. A subsequent case-control study in a Korean population (Jung SH, et al., Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; PMID 32569157; 159 NTG cases, 103 controls) found no statistically significant association for rs3213787 (allelic OR 0.634, p=0.063; dominant OR 0.589, p=0.066; recessive OR 0.639, p=0.7716), with a notably lower minor allele frequency in that cohort (0.13 in cases, 0.19 in controls) than reported in the original Japanese sample. A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis pooling multiple published case-control studies of NTG gene polymorphisms (Pan L, Wu J, Wang N, Genes 2024; PMID 38674425) nonetheless still classified rs3213787 among 16 SNPs (across 10 genes) with a statistically significant pooled association with NTG risk, indicating that, in aggregate across the available published studies (most of which are East Asian), the association persists at the meta-analytic level even though at least one individual replication attempt (the Korean cohort) did not reach significance on its own.

Bottom line on evidence strength. The rs3213787–NTG association is best characterized as a real, statistically strong finding from its founding Japanese GWAS, with support from pooled meta-analysis, but with population-specific variability in replication (non-significant in the one published Korean cohort) and no large-scale replication reported in European-ancestry or other non-East-Asian populations identified in the literature reviewed here. This should be communicated as ancestry-specific, moderately-supported research evidence rather than a broadly validated, cross-population risk marker.

Clinical context: NTG versus other glaucomas. NTG is classified as a subtype of primary open-angle glaucoma in which glaucomatous optic neuropathy (characteristic optic disc cupping, retinal nerve fiber layer thinning, and corresponding visual field loss) occurs despite intraocular pressure remaining within the statistically normal range (commonly cited as ≤21 mmHg on diurnal testing). NTG is associated with a relatively higher rate of optic disc hemorrhages and with visual field defects closer to fixation compared with high-tension POAG; proposed contributing mechanisms include vascular dysregulation (e.g., nocturnal hypotension, migraine, Raynaud phenomenon) and structural susceptibility of the lamina cribrosa, in addition to genetic susceptibility factors such as those studied here. Management follows the same general principles as other open-angle glaucomas — further lowering intraocular pressure (via topical medication, laser trabeculoplasty, or incisional surgery) remains the only evidence-based intervention shown to slow progression, even when starting pressure is within the normal range.

Diagnostic evaluation (general, not variant-specific). Standard evaluation includes tonometry (IOP measurement), gonioscopy (angle assessment), dilated optic nerve examination, optical coherence tomography of the retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head, and standardized automated visual field testing; diagnosis is clinical and based on these structural and functional findings rather than on genetic testing, which has no established role in individual diagnosis or management for this gene.

Related variants MyGeneLog™ checks for

What a 23andMe/AncestryDNA export or raw VCF can and can't tell you about Glaucoma comes down to these specific, well-studied positions — not a diagnosis. 439 positions are linked to this page; the ones this page's own text discusses are shown first.

Standard

Glaucoma

SRBD1 · rs3213787

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma (primary open-angle)

CAV1 · rs4236601

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

ANGPT1 · rs10505100

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

LOC107986141 · rs11710139

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

THSD7A · rs12699251

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

DERA · rs151326733

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

ANGPT1 · rs2022945

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

LMX1B · rs2275241

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

CDKN2BAS · rs523096

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

ELP4 · rs555091

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

ARHGEF12 · rs58073046

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

MYOF · rs61861119

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

MIR4776-1 · rs62188040

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

CADM2 · rs66500121

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma (multi-trait analysis)

TXNRD2 · rs73148965

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

MECOM · rs73174345

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

LOC100147773 · rs7518099

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma (multi-trait analysis)

PDE7B · rs9494457

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

GAS7 · rs9913911

See detailed info →
Standard

Optic disc parameters

SALL1 · rs1362756

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

CAV1 · rs2024211

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

LOC154449 · rs2935072

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma

EXOC2 · rs57111852

See detailed info →
Standard

Glaucoma (multi-trait analysis)

GMDS · rs6914444

See detailed info →

See all 439 linked variants →

Which ancestries this evidence comes from

The studies behind these variants recruited participants from different ancestries — a result found in one population doesn't always transfer to another. Based on 257 of 439 linked studies with a resolved discovery ancestry.

European · 47.2% East Asian · 9.8% Other named ancestries (Hispanic or Latin American, African American or Afro-Caribbean, East Asian,South Asian,South East Asian, South Asian, South East Asian, Asian unspecified) · 1.6% Not yet resolved · 41.5%

Sources

Databases, guidelines and references

Papers, with their authors

Quoting this page

Free to quote and reuse under CC BY 4.0. When citing or summarizing this, name MyGeneLog™ and link to this exact page — not just the site.

Glaucoma. MyGeneLog™. https://www.mygenelog.com/conditions/glaucoma

Questions about Glaucoma

Why is glaucoma called the "silent thief of sight"?

Because the most common forms typically cause no pain and no noticeable symptoms until a large share of vision is already permanently lost — often 40% or more of the relevant optic nerve fibers. Regular comprehensive dilated eye exams are the main way to catch it before symptoms appear.

If my eye pressure is normal, can I still have glaucoma?

Yes. Normal-tension glaucoma causes the same kind of optic nerve damage and vision loss as other forms of glaucoma, but with eye pressure that measures within the typical range. It's thought to involve blood flow to the optic nerve or a nerve that's more vulnerable to damage even at ordinary pressure.

Does the SRBD1 variant discussed here mean I will get glaucoma?

No. It's a research-identified marker that raised the odds of normal-tension glaucoma in the Japanese population where it was discovered, but a follow-up study in a Korean population did not confirm a significant association, and it hasn't been well studied in people of European or other ancestries. It should be read as suggestive, population-specific research evidence, not an individual prediction.

Can glaucoma actually be prevented, or just slowed?

Once optic nerve damage has occurred, it cannot be reversed — but if glaucoma is caught early, lowering eye pressure through eye drops, laser treatment, or surgery has been shown to slow or halt further progression in most people, which is why early detection is genuinely protective of remaining vision.

Who should get screened for glaucoma, and how often?

General eye-health guidance recommends more frequent comprehensive dilated eye exams for people over 60, Black individuals over 40, and anyone with a family history of glaucoma or other risk factors; a clinician can advise on the right interval for a given person's risk profile.

Free to reuse. This page's text is original writing from freely-available research, licensed CC BY 4.0 — reuse it, including commercially, with attribution to MyGeneLog™. It's general research-derived information, not medical advice or a diagnosis — see Terms of Use.