For researchers

Is your paper here?

2,657 papers hold this site up. Every variant and condition page names the research it was written from, and this is that list, gathered from the pages themselves. Search your name, your journal, or a PMID.

12 matches for Whittemore AS.

Genome-wide association analysis of more than 120,000 individuals identifies 15 new susceptibility loci for breast cancer
BOCS · kConFab Investigators and 3 more consortia
Nature genetics · 2015 · PMID 25751625 · open access
12 pages+
rs2012709 rs12048493 rs72755295 rs4593472 rs13267382 rs745570
Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci
NBCS Collaborators · ABCTB Investigators and 1 more consortia
Nature · 2017 · PMID 29059683 · open access
12 pages+
rs71557345 rs6904031 rs56387622 rs11624333 rs1895062 rs13294895
Identification of 12 new susceptibility loci for different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer
AOCS study group · EMBRACE Study and 4 more consortia
Nature genetics · 2017 · PMID 28346442
9 pages
rs1879586 rs7207826 rs11651755 rs688187 rs7902587 rs9886651
Cross-Cancer Genome-Wide Analysis of Lung, Ovary, Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer Reveals Novel Pleiotropic Associations
Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) · PRACTICAL Consortium and 3 more consortia
Cancer research · 2016 · PMID 27197191
6 pages
rs11844632 rs4808075 rs56084662 rs11571833 rs186507655 rs148883465
Genome-Wide Meta-Analyses of Breast, Ovarian, and Prostate Cancer Association Studies Identify Multiple New Susceptibility Loci Shared by at Least Two Cancer Types
ABCTB Investigators · AOCS Study Group & Australian Cancer Study (Ovarian Cancer) and 5 more consortia
Cancer discovery · 2016 · PMID 27432226
6 pages
rs2628317 rs17762342 rs739704 rs3802173 rs1469713 rs9657608
Identification of ten variants associated with risk of estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer
ABCTB Investigators · EMBRACE and 4 more consortia
Nature genetics · 2017 · PMID 29058716
5 pages
rs10995201 rs9397437 rs6562760 rs6678914 rs67397200
Genome-wide association study of 398,238 women unveils seven loci associated with high-grade serous ovarian cancer
NPJ genomic medicine · 2025 · PMID 41266372 · open access
4 pages
rs6979 rs768719522 rs1013698558 rs528577783
Identification of six new susceptibility loci for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer
EMBRACE · GEMO Study Collaborators and 6 more consortia
Nature genetics · 2015 · PMID 25581431 · open access
3 pages
rs10088218 rs8170 rs9303542
Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies eight new susceptibility loci for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Nature communications · 2020 · PMID 32041948 · open access
3 pages
rs6791479 rs10399947 Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Identification of 31 loci for mammographic density phenotypes and their associations with breast cancer risk
Nature communications · 2020 · PMID 33037222 · open access
3 pages
rs10995181 rs4849864 rs6001984
A genome-wide association study identifies a new ovarian cancer susceptibility locus on 9p22.2
Australian Cancer (Ovarian) Study · Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group and 1 more consortia
Nature genetics · 2009 · PMID 19648919
2 pages
rs3814113 Ovarian Cancer
Identification of Susceptibility Loci for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2016 · PMID 26829030
1 page
rs35063026

Questions about this list

Why is my paper here? I never gave you permission.

Nothing of your paper is reproduced here. This page records that a MyGeneLog™ page cites your work, and links to the paper on PubMed — which is what a citation is. Your title and author list come from Europe PMC, the same public record a library catalogue uses.

Why are all the authors listed instead of "et al."?

Because a study that needed 622 people is a different kind of study from one that needed four, and "et al." erases that. Twelve names show and the rest are one click away. Everyone is searchable, including the 187th name on a consortium paper — that person exists and may be looking for it.

My name is misspelt, or the paper is wrong.

Tell us and it is fixed. Names come from the public record and initials are inconsistent across databases; where two people share a form of a name we cannot separate them, and we would rather be corrected than guess.

My paper is not here. Does that mean you rejected it?

No. This catalogue is assembled from what a small team could read, and it is thinnest outside European-ancestry cohorts. A paper is absent because nobody has got to it, not because it was assessed and turned down.

Which pages rest on a paper?

Each row lists them, up to six, and links to each one. The count beside a row is how many pages cite it in total.

How often does this change?

It is rebuilt from the pages every hour. A paper appears the moment a page starts resting on it and disappears if that page stops — there is no separate list to keep in step, because the citation lives on the page that makes the claim.