Ophthalmic

Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Reviewed September 11, 2026

The leading cause of vision loss in older adults in high-income countries. Two genes discovered in 2005 — CFH and ARMS2 — account for most of the known genetic risk; a run of later meta-analyses added ten smaller loci, mostly in the same complement and lipid-metabolism pathways.

What this condition connects to

Age-Related Macular Degeneration Variant: rs1061170 rs1061170 Variant Variant: rs10490924 rs10490924 Variant Variant: rs9380272 rs9380272 Variant Variant: rs429608 rs429608 Variant Variant: rs493258 rs493258 Variant Variant: +8 more +8 more Variant Topic: Short-sightedness and screens Short-sightedness and screens Topic Age-Related Macular Degeneration Age-Related Macular Degeneration Ophthalmic

Solid lines are connections this site curates. Dashed lines mean the two ends share a research paper — worth knowing, and not a claim that one explains the other.

Prevalence
The leading cause of vision loss in older adults in high-income countries. Wong et al. 2014 pooled 129,664 people across 39 population-based studies and estimated prevalence (ages 45-85) at 8.69%, projecting 196 million people affected worldwide by 2020 and 288 million by 2040 (PMID:25104651).
Inheritance
Common variants across twelve loci from five separate studies. CFH (Y402H) and ARMS2 (A69S), both found in 2005, carry by far the largest individual effects and combine when both are present; the other ten, from four later meta-analyses, are individually smaller.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) damages the macula, the part of the retina responsible for sharp, central vision — the vision used for reading, driving and recognising faces. It is the leading cause of vision loss in older adults in high-income countries. A 2014 systematic review and meta-analysis of 129,664 people across 39 population-based studies put the pooled prevalence at 8.69% of people aged 45–85, and projected 196 million people affected worldwide by 2020, rising to 288 million by 2040.

Two genes, found in 2005, that changed the field

Before 2005, AMD's genetics were largely unknown. Two papers that year identified the two largest-effect loci still known: CFH (complement factor H) and ARMS2 (also called LOC387715), on different chromosomes and acting independently.

Zareparsi et al. 2005 found the Y402H variant (rs1061170) in CFH strongly associated with AMD in a single-center case-control study: the risk (C) allele was carried at 0.61 frequency in cases versus 0.34 in controls (P<10⁻²⁴), with a genotype relative risk of 2.44 (95% CI 2.08–2.83) for one copy and 5.93 (95% CI 4.33–8.02) for two. CFH is not a statistical curiosity here — it regulates the complement system, part of the innate immune response, and complement dysregulation is one of the field's leading mechanistic explanations for AMD.

Rivera et al. 2005, working in a German cohort (1,166 cases, 945 controls), found a second, independent locus: the Ala69Ser variant (rs10490924) in ARMS2, with a per-variant association of P=10⁻³⁴. Critically, the paper tested the two genes together and found their effects combine: people homozygous for both the CFH and ARMS2 risk alleles had a disease odds ratio of 57.6 (95% CI 37.2–89.0) compared with the baseline non-risk genotype — far higher than either gene alone.

Ten more loci, mostly the same two pathways

Larger genome-wide association studies through the 2010s added ten more loci, most of them landing in the same two biological stories as CFH and ARMS2: complement regulation and lipid metabolism. Chen et al. 2010 (PNAS) reported signals near TIMP3 and several HDL-cholesterol-associated genes, including confirmation at the complement-adjacent CFB region (rs9380272, rs429608). Neale et al. 2010 (PNAS) implicated the hepatic lipase gene LIPC and, in the same discovery scan, a locus near ALDH1A2 (rs493258). Sobrin et al. 2012 (Ophthalmology), comparing AMD subtypes, added a variant near C1QTNF5/MFRP associated specifically with the choroidal-neovascularisation subtype (rs10033900). Fritsche et al. 2013 (Nature Genetics) — the largest of these studies — reported seven new genome-wide-significant loci at once, six of which are on this page: CETP, LIPC, SLC16A8, RAD51B, B3GALTL and FILIP1L.

Taken together, the twelve variants on this page span five separate studies published between 2005 and 2013. The two 2005 findings, CFH and ARMS2, remain by far the largest individual effects; everything found afterward has been smaller, and mostly reinforces the same two pathways rather than opening new ones.

In the news

2021-07-29 · Hospital Clínic de Barcelona & IDIBAPS (Dr. Blanca Molins, Ocular Inflammation research group)

Complement Factor H (CFH) may be involved in age-related macular degeneration (AMD)

Barcelona researchers described how the CFH Y402H risk variant (rs1061170, profiled on this site) changes how well complement factor H regulates inflammation and oxidative stress in the retina, and how a separate protein, FHR4 (made from the related CFHR4 gene), can compete with CFH and blunt its protective effect -- a mechanistic explanation for why this one variant carries such a large share of AMD risk. This is an older finding (2021), included here because the date is accurate and the mechanism it describes is still the current explanation, not because it is recent.

Clinical detail

What is actually diagnosed and treated here

AMD is diagnosed with a dilated eye exam, retinal imaging (optical coherence tomography, fundus photography) and sometimes fluorescein angiography — not by genotype. Treatment depends on stage and subtype: regular monitoring and the AREDS2 antioxidant/mineral formula for intermediate disease, anti-VEGF injections for the neovascular ("wet") form. None of that is decided by the variants on this page — including a once-widely-discussed claim that CFH and ARMS2 genotype should change which AREDS2 ingredients someone takes, covered on the AREDS2 page, which did not hold up under independent re-analysis.

CFH and ARMS2 are marked as sensitive on this site because their individual effect sizes are unusually large for a common genetic variant, and the combined-genotype result from Rivera et al. 2005 — an OR of 57.6 for the highest-risk combination — is the kind of number that reads as far more deterministic than it should. Most people who carry a risk allele at either gene never develop advanced AMD; the studies behind these numbers report relative and combined risk in case-control cohorts, not absolute individual risk, and family history, smoking status and cardiovascular risk factors all still matter independently.

The other ten variants each come from one of four subsequent GWAS papers, all reporting genome-wide-significant but individually smaller associations. This page's honest reading of them is as five separate replications of the same underlying story — complement and lipid pathways drive AMD susceptibility — rather than ten new independent risks to track.

Related variants MyGeneLog™ checks for

What a 23andMe/AncestryDNA export or raw VCF can and can't tell you about Age-Related Macular Degeneration comes down to these specific, well-studied positions — not a diagnosis.

Sensitive

Age-related macular degeneration

CFH · rs1061170

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Age-related macular degeneration

ARMS2 · rs10490924

See detailed info →
Standard

Age-related macular degeneration

CFB · rs9380272

See detailed info →
Standard

Age-related macular degeneration

CFB · rs429608

See detailed info →
Standard

Age-related macular degeneration

ALDH1A2 · rs493258

See detailed info →
Standard

Age-related macular degeneration (choroidal neovascularisation)

CF1 · rs10033900

See detailed info →
Standard

Age-related macular degeneration

CETP · rs1864163

See detailed info →
Standard

Age-related macular degeneration

RAD51B · rs8017304

See detailed info →
Standard

Age-related macular degeneration

SLC16A8 · rs8135665

See detailed info →
Standard

Age-related macular degeneration

LIPC · rs920915

See detailed info →
Standard

Age-related macular degeneration

B3GALTL · rs9542236

See detailed info →
Standard

Age-related macular degeneration

FILIP1L · rs13081855

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Disease progression in age-related macular degeneration

C2 · rs116503776

See detailed info →

Which ancestries this evidence comes from

The studies behind these variants recruited participants from different ancestries — a result found in one population doesn't always transfer to another. Based on 11 of 13 linked studies with a resolved discovery ancestry.

European · 30.8% East Asian · 46.2% Other named ancestries (NR) · 7.7% Not yet resolved · 15.4%

Sources

Databases, guidelines and references

Papers, with their authors

Questions about Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Can these variants diagnose AMD or predict who will get it?

No. AMD is diagnosed with a dilated eye exam and retinal imaging. These variants come from genome-wide association and case-control studies and are not used diagnostically — carrying a risk allele, even at CFH and ARMS2, does not mean AMD will develop.

Why are CFH and ARMS2 marked "sensitive" while the other ten variants are not?

Their individual and combined effect sizes are unusually large for common genetic variants — a relative risk of 5.93 for CFH alone, and a combined odds ratio of 57.6 when both CFH and ARMS2 risk genotypes are present. That reads as more deterministic than any single genetic test result should.

Do all twelve variants act through the same biological mechanism?

Roughly two pathways. CFH and the CFB-region variants sit in the complement system, part of innate immunity; CETP, LIPC and the TIMP3/HDL-associated loci sit in lipid metabolism. ARMS2's mechanism is still not well understood, and it has no established function beyond its association with AMD.

How common is age-related macular degeneration?

A 2014 meta-analysis of 129,664 people found a pooled prevalence of 8.69% in people aged 45-85, and projected 196 million people affected worldwide by 2020, rising to 288 million by 2040.

Free to reuse. This page's text is original writing from freely-available research, licensed CC BY 4.0 — reuse it, including commercially, with attribution to MyGeneLog™. It's general research-derived information, not medical advice or a diagnosis — see Terms of Use.