For researchers

Is your paper here?

2,647 papers hold this site up. Every variant and condition page names the research it was written from, and this is that list, gathered from the pages themselves. Search your name, your journal, or a PMID.

8 matches for Tam PO.

Meta-analysis of gene-environment-wide association scans accounting for education level identifies additional loci for refractive error
Consortium for Refractive Error and Myopia
Nature communications · 2016 · PMID 27020472 · open access
10 pages
rs10089517 rs6495367 rs6500957 rs72483203 rs929474 rs10853531
Genome-wide analysis identified 17 new loci influencing intraocular pressure in Chinese population
Science China. Life sciences · 2019 · PMID 30591961
5 pages
rs12504231 rs7047871 rs11078446 rs17737857 rs4467035
Common variants near CAV1 and CAV2 are associated with primary open-angle glaucoma
Nature genetics · 2010 · PMID 20835238
1 page
rs4236601
Genetic variants at 13q12.12 are associated with high myopia in the Han Chinese population
American journal of human genetics · 2011 · PMID 21640322
1 page
rs9318086
A genome-wide meta-analysis identifies two novel loci associated with high myopia in the Han Chinese population
Human molecular genetics · 2013 · PMID 23406873
1 page
rs4455882
Genome-wide association study identifies ZFHX1B as a susceptibility locus for severe myopia
Nagahama Study Group
Human molecular genetics · 2013 · PMID 23933737
1 page
rs6469937
Genome-wide association study identifies five new susceptibility loci for primary angle closure glaucoma
Nature genetics · 2016 · PMID 27064256
1 page
rs3739821
Genome-wide association study identified novel loci and gene-environment interaction for refractive error in children
NPJ genomic medicine · 2025 · PMID 40410244 · open access
1 page
rs17074027

Questions about this list

Why is my paper here? I never gave you permission.

Nothing of your paper is reproduced here. This page records that a MyGeneLog™ page cites your work, and links to the paper on PubMed — which is what a citation is. Your title and author list come from Europe PMC, the same public record a library catalogue uses.

Why are all the authors listed instead of "et al."?

Because a study that needed 622 people is a different kind of study from one that needed four, and "et al." erases that. Twelve names show and the rest are one click away. Everyone is searchable, including the 187th name on a consortium paper — that person exists and may be looking for it.

My name is misspelt, or the paper is wrong.

Tell us and it is fixed. Names come from the public record and initials are inconsistent across databases; where two people share a form of a name we cannot separate them, and we would rather be corrected than guess.

My paper is not here. Does that mean you rejected it?

No. This catalogue is assembled from what a small team could read, and it is thinnest outside European-ancestry cohorts. A paper is absent because nobody has got to it, not because it was assessed and turned down.

Which pages rest on a paper?

Each row lists them, up to six, and links to each one. The count beside a row is how many pages cite it in total.

How often does this change?

It is rebuilt from the pages every hour. A paper appears the moment a page starts resting on it and disappears if that page stops — there is no separate list to keep in step, because the citation lives on the page that makes the claim.