301 positions on this site are linked to Neuroticism, out of 118,672 published in total. Each was published only after passing the same quality gate; being on this list is an association, not a diagnosis.
MBD5 · rs10174206
See detailed info → Standardnear FANCL · rs17398913
See detailed info → Standardnear STAG1 · rs6795372
See detailed info → StandardAATK · rs9901521
See detailed info → Standardnear C1orf53 · rs12145078
See detailed info → Standardnear TMEM161B · rs13168787
See detailed info → StandardCELF4 · rs4799454
See detailed info → Standardnear TLR4 · rs2149351
See detailed info → Standardnear MEF2C · rs35991856
See detailed info → StandardL3MBTL2 · rs2273085
See detailed info → StandardXKR6 · rs35792458
See detailed info → StandardPLEKHM1 · rs144733372
See detailed info → StandardPLXNC1 · rs4761545
See detailed info → StandardDRD2 · rs4938021
See detailed info → StandardCELF4 · rs12961969
See detailed info → StandardLINGO1 · rs12903563
See detailed info → StandardPDCD6IP · rs35688236
See detailed info → StandardCELF4 · rs1187264
See detailed info → StandardPTRD · rs12378446
See detailed info → StandardTMEM192 · rs62353264
See detailed info →Showing 20 of 301 · page 14 of 16
One specific position in the genome (an rsID), explained in plain language with what published research has found it linked to, and how strong that link actually is.
The public GWAS Catalog, checked every twenty minutes, plus variants added manually after research review. Every one passes the same quality gate before publishing.
No. Listing reflects an association from published research, not a diagnosis or a cause. Most common variants shift probability modestly rather than determining an outcome.
Yes — the search box above matches gene symbols and rsIDs as well as trait names.