For researchers

Is your paper here?

2,676 papers hold this site up. Every variant and condition page names the research it was written from, and this is that list, gathered from the pages themselves. Search your name, your journal, or a PMID.

6 matches for Jiang C.

Multi-ancestry genome-wide meta-analysis identifies novel basal cell carcinoma loci and shared genetic effects with squamous cell carcinoma
23andMe Research Team
Communications biology · 2024 · PMID 38182794 · open access
12 pages+
rs71396949 rs12833418 rs2797304 rs2359795 rs6741117 rs7582362
Multi-ancestry genome-wide association analyses of refractive error augment genetic discovery and polygenic prediction
Estonian Biobank Research Team · 23andMe Research Team
Nature genetics · 2026 · PMID 42009823 · open access
12 pages+
rs4674113 rs77541496 rs757747 rs1325019 rs72810190 rs73965128
Genome-wide association meta-analysis of childhood ADHD symptoms and diagnosis identifies new loci and potential effector genes
Nature genetics · 2025 · PMID 40962958
9 pages
rs7708883 rs4462678 rs9959583 rs4131786 rs1435746 rs7100410
Large-scale GWAS of strabismus identifies risk loci and provides support for a link with maternal smoking
Lifelines Cohort Study
Nature communications · 2025 · PMID 40849414 · open access
4 pages
rs3778977 rs4908704 rs8070929 Exotropia
GWAS meta-analysis of cerebrospinal fluid Alzheimer's biomarkers reveals loci regulating lipids, brain volume and autophagy
Nature communications · 2026 · PMID 42014397 · open access
4 pages
rs4843552 rs798560 rs35327527 rs7928895
A multiethnic genome-wide analysis of 19,420 individuals identifies novel loci associated with axial length and shared genetic influences with refractive error and myopia
Consortium for Refractive Error and Myopia (CREAM)
Frontiers in genetics · 2023 · PMID 37351342 · open access
2 pages
rs2181346 rs869422

Questions about this list

Why is my paper here? I never gave you permission.

Nothing of your paper is reproduced here. This page records that a MyGeneLog™ page cites your work, and links to the paper on PubMed — which is what a citation is. Your title and author list come from Europe PMC, the same public record a library catalogue uses.

Why are all the authors listed instead of "et al."?

Because a study that needed 622 people is a different kind of study from one that needed four, and "et al." erases that. Twelve names show and the rest are one click away. Everyone is searchable, including the 187th name on a consortium paper — that person exists and may be looking for it.

My name is misspelt, or the paper is wrong.

Tell us and it is fixed. Names come from the public record and initials are inconsistent across databases; where two people share a form of a name we cannot separate them, and we would rather be corrected than guess.

My paper is not here. Does that mean you rejected it?

No. This catalogue is assembled from what a small team could read, and it is thinnest outside European-ancestry cohorts. A paper is absent because nobody has got to it, not because it was assessed and turned down.

Which pages rest on a paper?

Each row lists them, up to six, and links to each one. The count beside a row is how many pages cite it in total.

How often does this change?

It is rebuilt from the pages every hour. A paper appears the moment a page starts resting on it and disappears if that page stops — there is no separate list to keep in step, because the citation lives on the page that makes the claim.