Metabolic

Type 2 Diabetes

Reviewed September 15, 2026

One in nine adults worldwide lives with diabetes, and the great majority of it is type 2. Hundreds of variants each nudge the risk a little — and what you eat, which your genes also have a say in, does more.

What this condition connects to

Type 2 Diabetes Variant: rs1552224 rs1552224 Variant Variant: rs5945326 rs5945326 Variant Variant: rs8050136 rs8050136 Variant Variant: rs2237892 rs2237892 Variant Variant: rs2237897 rs2237897 Variant Variant: +1086 more +1086 more Variant Drug: Metformin Metformin Drug Drug: Sulfonylureas Sulfonylureas Drug Topic: Blood sugar and insulin Blood sugar and insulin Topic Topic: Heart and circulation Heart and circulation Topic Topic: Exercise and muscle Exercise and muscle Topic Type 2 Diabetes Type 2 Diabetes Metabolic

Solid lines are connections this site curates. Dashed lines mean the two ends share a research paper — worth knowing, and not a claim that one explains the other.

Prevalence
The International Diabetes Federation (IDF Diabetes Atlas, 11th edition, 2025) estimates 589 million adults aged 20-79 living with diabetes worldwide — about one in nine — projected to reach 853 million by 2050. Type 1 diabetes accounts for an estimated 9.15 million of adult cases, so the great majority of the total is type 2. Prevalence varies several-fold between countries and a substantial share is undiagnosed.
Inheritance
Polygenic and multifactorial, not Mendelian. Hundreds of common variants each contribute a small amount, and no single one determines the outcome. Family history is a real and useful risk indicator, but it reflects shared environment as well as shared genes. Rare monogenic forms of diabetes exist (MODY, neonatal diabetes) and are a separate diagnosis from what this page describes.

Type 2 diabetes is the condition in which the body stops responding properly to insulin and, over time, stops making enough of it. Blood sugar rises and stays high, and the damage it does — to eyes, kidneys, nerves and blood vessels — accumulates quietly over years before anything hurts.

It is common on a scale that is hard to picture. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) counts 589 million adults aged 20 to 79 living with diabetes, about one in nine, and projects 853 million by 2050. The overwhelming majority of that is type 2.

What the genetics can and cannot tell you

Type 2 diabetes is polygenic to an unusual degree: hundreds of positions each shift the odds slightly, and no single one of them decides anything. The three on this site are among the better-replicated:

Put together, these three explain very little of who develops the disease. That is not a failure of the research; it is what the research found. Type 2 diabetes rose sharply in populations whose genes did not change, which by itself tells you where most of the risk lives.

Where this connects to the rest of the site

Two threads run out of this page, and both are the reason it exists.

Medicines. Sulfonylureas are among the oldest diabetes drugs still in use, and CYP2C9 — the enzyme that clears them — is one of the most variable drug-metabolising genes there is. The reduced-function forms genuinely do slow that clearance. And the prescribing guidance still says not to change the dose for it. That gap between "a real biological effect" and "a reason to do something differently" is exactly what a page like this is for, and it is written up on the sulfonylureas page.

Food. Weight and diet do more to type 2 diabetes risk than every variant here combined, and what a person eats is not purely a matter of will. The bitter-taste receptor TAS2R38 decides whether a whole family of vegetables tastes sharp or of almost nothing — see bitter taste perception — and the genetics of smell and taste is where the genome most directly touches the plate. It would be wrong to draw a straight line from a taste genotype to a diabetes diagnosis, and this site will not draw one. But the honest version is still interesting: the same genome that shifts your odds a few percent also shapes what you find pleasant to eat, and the second effect is the larger one.

The blood test itself has genetics too

HbA1c — one of the three tests named below — measures how much sugar has stuck permanently to hemoglobin, the protein that carries oxygen in red blood cells. That should make it a pure measure of blood sugar, and mostly it is. But this page's remaining 16 variants, from three studies of HbA1c genetics specifically, split cleanly into two very different kinds.

Some genuinely move blood sugar — rs1799884 (GCK) among them — and raise real glycemic risk along with the test result. Others move HbA1c without touching blood sugar at all, by changing red blood cell biology instead: how long a red cell survives, or how the sugar already stuck to its hemoglobin gets removed. rs1046896 and rs1046875, both in FN3K — the enzyme that actually strips glucose back off hemoglobin — are the clearest examples. A 2017 study of up to 159,940 people found that a genetic score built from these erythrocyte-pathway variants predicted a higher HbA1c-based diabetes diagnosis without predicting higher diabetes incidence — the test result moved, the disease did not.

For most people that is a curiosity. For one specific group it is not: the same study found a variant in G6PD, carried by roughly 11% of men of African ancestry, that lowers measured HbA1c by 0.81 percentage points per allele in men and 0.68 in women — enough on its own to push real diabetes below the diagnostic threshold. The authors estimate this leaves roughly 2% of African American adults with type 2 diabetes undiagnosed by HbA1c screening alone, and recommend a direct glucose test, or a genotype-adjusted threshold, wherever G6PD deficiency is common.

What to do with this

Nothing here diagnoses anything. Type 2 diabetes is diagnosed with a blood test — fasting glucose, HbA1c or an oral glucose tolerance test — and no genotype substitutes for one. If you have risk factors, the useful action is the blood test, not the variant. And the things that move the risk most are the unglamorous ones: weight, what you eat, how much you move, and whether it runs in your family.

Positions joined since this page was written

What this is The text above discusses the variants this page was written around. Since then the catalogue has joined 755 more positions to it, by shared trait or shared paper. They are listed here by the paper each came from; the text does not describe them, and each variant page carries that study's own record.

Suzuki K et al. 2024, Nature rs116929578 (TCF7L2), rs114322470 (TCF7L2), rs7224685 (ZZEF1), rs12811407 (FBRSL1), rs142395395 (near ZNF208), rs147581833 (ANKH), rs6570526 (near HIVEP2), rs33959228 (ZNF76), rs96844 (near MAP3K1), rs76549217 (ANKH), rs4807125 (TCF3), rs11045247 (PDE3A) and 309 more — PMID:38374256

Vujkovic M et al. 2020, Nature genetics rs11602873 (ARAP1), rs80196932 (near NUS1), rs36062478 (PTEN), rs543159 (SLC22A3), rs12031188 (FAF1), rs12128213 (near LINC00862), rs12920022 (SPG7), rs4129858 (LAMC1), rs9892728 (RAMP2-AS1), rs13414140 (THADA), rs61779275 (MACF1), rs12986742 (LINC01122) and 165 more — PMID:32541925

Mahajan A et al. 2022, Nature genetics rs3806155 (TSBP1-AS1), rs7313668 (near TSPAN8), rs76227980 (near MC4R), rs41277236 (NEUROG3), rs78470967 (near FGF6), rs34165267 (near PPIAP23), rs10052346 (DMGDH), rs139027698 (near Y_RNA), rs12669223 (PAX4), rs3768301 (MACF1), rs72830009 (near RNU7-165P), rs7100404 (VTI1A) and 24 more — PMID:35551307

Spracklen CN et al. 2020, Nature rs117267808 (GP2), rs4711389 (HMGA1), rs75536691 (GRB14), rs7787720 (ETV1), rs1955163 (TSPAN15), rs3751236 (KLHDC5), rs2706710 (PITPNC1), rs61342118 (PAX4), rs7656416 (CTBP1), rs12907887 (INAFM2), rs73085586 (FOXA2), rs13086331 (BCL6-LPP) and 21 more — PMID:32499647

Huerta-Chagoya A et al. 2024, Nature genetics rs6752053 (LINC02934), rs2074314 (near KCNJ11), rs72802352 (CTRB2), rs12912777 (RASGRP1), rs73226260 (HNF1A-AS1), rs2351707 (ARPIN-AP3S2), rs719727 (near RSPO3), rs7974748 (near TSPAN8), rs15943 (MAP3K15), rs6066137 (EYA2), rs1215466 (LINC01080), rs10771371 (near RN7SKP15) and 20 more — PMID:39379762

Elashi AA et al. 2024, BMC medical genomics rs6919908 (USP8P1), rs11926494 (UBE2E2), rs115246607 (PPIP5K2), rs1278516 (FAF1-AS1), rs2077235 (near NLRC3), rs57078845 (CHD1L), rs17122779 (SLC7A7), rs72832348 (CDKAL1), rs62008452 (PEAK1), rs72834308 (CDKAL1), rs113397277 (LINC02935), rs71304088 (SYN2) and 19 more — PMID:38685053

Sakaue S et al. 2021, Nature genetics rs4391603 (near DUSP9), rs13342232 (SLC16A11), rs1002389 (UBE3C), rs17072370 (LINC01080), rs2292893 (LINC01991), rs3751297 (FBRSL1), rs11033115 (SLC1A2), rs11202627 (near PTEN), rs531416278 (ADA), rs12662968 (near RPL35AP3), rs6496742 (PRC1-AS1), rs537982442 (near NEUROG3) and 18 more — PMID:34594039

Mahajan A et al. 2018, Nature genetics rs2642588 (NEUROG3), rs7918400 (TCF7L2), rs1796330 (TSPAN8), rs17836088 (NRXN3), rs1061810 (HSD17B12), rs4925109 (RAI1), rs11820019 (CCND1), rs4281707 (FTO), rs80147536 (THADA), rs67254669 (KCNJ11), rs234853 (KCNQ1), rs184509201 (TCF7L2) and 12 more — PMID:30297969

Verma A et al. 2024, Science (New York, N.Y.) rs4696136 (near TMEM154), rs9457 (WFS1), rs1977832 (near Y_RNA), rs77791126 (THADA), rs9523299 (near PPIAP23), rs4737000 (near ANK1), rs183910463 (RFLNA), rs538810025 (B3GALT1), rs183360430 (PENK-AS1), rs550539923 (near SUMO2P2), rs703969 (ZMIZ1), rs564787815 (near ZNF734P) and 7 more — PMID:39024449

Ishigaki K et al. 2020, Nature genetics rs3816157 (PSMD6-AS1), rs187150787 (SPPL3), rs6950739 (UBE3C), rs150626020 (SND1), rs193457 (near FGFR4), rs2283159 (KCNQ1), rs80005921 (near GTF3AP5), rs138213721 (SPPL3), rs39218 (STEAP2-AS1), rs4964665 (WSCD2), rs7721099 (MIR9-2HG) — PMID:32514122

Suzuki K et al. 2019, Nature genetics rs79407053 (MAEA), rs2908279 (GCK), rs9505085 (SSR1), rs2844623 (POU5F1), rs201597274 (AGPAT9), rs76550717 (CENTD2), rs113547729 (ZZEF1), rs16884025 (PARP8), rs3751237 (KLHDC5), rs116549635 (INS-IGF2) — PMID:30718926

Islam MR et al. 2022, Genes rs10814274 (CREB3), rs73050128 (MAD1L1), rs4902684 (ACTN1), rs11140324 (near RMI1), rs11590235 (SKI) — PMID:36292730

Petty LE et al. 2025, Nature communications rs58223766 (near SLC16A13), rs117525671 (near CYCSP55), rs16989540 (DEPDC5), rs11936387 (MAEA) — PMID:40210677

Flannick J et al. 2019, Nature rs11257600 (CDC123), rs17737404 (ASCL2), rs2236033 (SFI1) — PMID:31118516

Meeks KAC et al. 2021, Genome medicine rs61848529 (near WAC), rs80316291 (near SUMO2P4), rs2853934 (near WASF5P) — PMID:34620218

Xue A et al. 2018, Nature communications rs117229942 (TCF7L2), rs2296173 (MACF1) — PMID:30054458

Ustinova M et al. 2021, BMC medical genomics rs3095447 (CCDC146), rs1132787 (GYPA) — PMID:33430853

Ray D et al. 2020, PLoS genetics rs4385321 (RGS17) — PMID:33290408

Liu Q et al. 2022, Diabetologia rs9930501 (FTO) — PMID:35771237

Grarup N et al. 2018, Diabetologia rs7330796 (TBC1D4) — PMID:29926116

Imamura M et al. 2016, Nature communications rs78627331 (IDE) — PMID:26818947

Huang LO et al. 2021, Nature metabolism rs9385400 (CENPW) — PMID:33619380

Zeggini E et al. 2008, Nature genetics rs12779790 (CDC123) — PMID:18372903

Guo H et al. 2022, Frontiers in microbiology rs6798189 (ADCY5) — PMID:36187959

Scott RA et al. 2017, Diabetes rs60780116 (ACSL1) — PMID:28566273

Cho YS et al. 2011, Nature genetics rs9470794 (ZFAND3) — PMID:22158537

Domínguez-Cruz MG et al. 2018, Gene rs1914711 (AGTR2) — PMID:30130595

Loh M et al. 2022, Communications biology rs76141923 (near LINC00377) — PMID:35393509

Guan M et al. 2019, Human genomics rs75029938 (GRAMD3) — PMID:31092297

In the news

2026-04-29 · Mass General Brigham Heart and Vascular Institute & Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, published in JACC (245,394 All of Us participants; validated in a separate 53,306-person biobank cohort)

Development and Validation of a Clinical Polygenic Risk Report in U.S.-Based Health Systems for 8 Cardiovascular Conditions

Researchers combined publicly available polygenic risk scores for 8 cardiovascular conditions (coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, venous thromboembolism, thoracic aortic aneurysm, extreme hypertension, severe hypercholesterolemia, elevated Lp(a)) into one integrated report, trained on 245,394 All of Us participants and validated in a separate 53,306-person biobank. People in the top 10% of genetic risk were 3.7x more likely to develop coronary artery disease and 3.1x more likely to develop type 2 diabetes than those at average risk. The test is now clinically available through Mass General Brigham's Laboratory for Molecular Medicine and Broad Clinical Labs -- a risk score, not a diagnosis or treatment.

2026-09-08 · Genome-Wide Association Analyses Identify Distinct Genetic Architectures for Extreme Early-Onset and Late-Onset T2D. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2026. DOI:10.1111/dom.71302

Type 2 diabetes diagnosed before 55 and after 70 look genetically different, not just clinically different

Using 74,795 UK Biobank participants, this study ran separate GWAS for type 2 diabetes diagnosed before age 55 (early-onset) versus at or after age 70 (late-onset) rather than treating T2D as one uniform trait. SNP-based heritability was nearly double for early-onset disease (11.2% vs 6.4%), and the two subtypes pointed to different biology: early-onset T2D was driven by beta-cell function and insulin-regulation genes, including SLC30A8 and IRS1 -- both already on this site's own type 2 diabetes page -- while late-onset T2D showed a more lipid-related genetic profile centered on APOE-associated signals and immune-cell expression patterns, a gene not previously linked to T2D on this site. Mendelian randomization found early-onset disease shared broader genetic overlap with cardiometabolic traits generally, while late-onset disease tracked more closely with classic metabolic risk factors -- evidence that age at diagnosis is not just a clinical detail but marks a real difference in underlying genetic architecture. This site's type 2 diabetes page carries 138 variants including SLC30A8 and IRS1; the study's specific SNPs were not yet indexed in GWAS Catalog with p-values at the time of writing, so this entry adds context rather than a new variant page.

2026-02-25 · A genome-wide association study identifies EYA2 as a contributing gene for diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes. Communications Medicine. 2026. DOI:10.1038/s43856-026-01465-1

A gene-level study finds type 2 diabetes causally drives diabetic retinopathy risk, via EYA2 and proinsulin

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a well-known complication of type 2 diabetes (T2D), but it was unclear how much of that connection is truly causal at the genetic level versus simply co-occurring. Using 16,988 T2D patients from UK Biobank, this study found a genome-wide significant lead SNP, rs6066146 in EYA2 (P=4.21x10^-8), associated with DR risk and replicated in three independent cohorts -- SNP-based heritability for DR was estimated at 14.6%. Colocalization analysis found moderate but distinct overlap between the DR and T2D signals at this locus, and critically, cis-Mendelian randomization provided gene-centric evidence that T2D itself exerts a causal effect on DR risk -- not just a shared risk factor coincidentally affecting both. A follow-up multivariable MR analysis identified proinsulin specifically as a significant mediator of that T2D-to-DR causal pathway. Tissue and pathway analyses pointed toward the spleen and B-cell biology as relevant, suggesting splenic B-cell abundance could eventually serve as a predictive marker for DR risk. This site's type 2 diabetes page carries 138 variants; EYA2 is not currently among them, and this finding is specifically about the diabetic retinopathy complication rather than T2D risk itself, so it is recorded as complication-specific context on the page rather than a general T2D variant.

2026-04-23 · PLOS Medicine

Largest-ever lipid metabolite GWAS in South Asians finds a diabetes-linked and a heart-protective variant

A metabolite GWAS of 516 lipid species in 3,000 Punjabi Sikhs (validated in 1.13M Europeans and 15,000 additional Asian Indians) found 609 SNP-metabolite associations, 33 of them never reported before. Mendelian randomization pointed at two variants with likely causal roles: a PTPRC (CD45) variant near LPC O-16:0 tied to type 2 diabetes risk, and a FADS1 3' UTR variant (rs174544) tied to a lipid that appears protective against coronary artery disease (OR 1.36 for the risk allele). PMID:42024661.

2026-04-15 · Bandesh K, Motakis E, Nargund S, et al. (The Jackson Laboratory), The EMBO Journal

Deep single-cell decoding of human pancreatic islets reveals T2D β-cell gene expression defects

A single-cell atlas of nearly 250,000 pancreatic islet cells from 48 donors (non-diabetic, prediabetic, and diabetic) found 511 genes with altered activity in type 2 diabetes beta cells, narrowed to 58 genes likely contributing to beta cell dysfunction -- centered on cell death and vitamin A metabolism pathways. This is an expression-atlas study, not a GWAS: its specific genes (including newly flagged GRAMD2B and PDZK1) are not among the 273 type 2 diabetes variants already in this catalogue, but it is a real mechanistic companion to why those variants matter. PMID:41986506.

2026-05-22 · Sinnott-Armstrong N, et al., Nature Communications 2026, PMID:42173832

Genetic variants affect diurnal glucose levels throughout the day

Circadian rhythms regulate glucose metabolism as well as sleep, but which genetic variants govern the timing of glucose had not been examined. Using the time of day each blood sample was taken, this study of about 420,000 UK Biobank participants — replicated in the Estonian Biobank, FinnGen, the VA Million Veteran Program and the MGB Biobank — shows that glucose levels are under diurnal genetic control. The two robust time-dependent signals are at MTNR1B, the melatonin receptor (rs10830963), and at CRY2, a core circadian clock gene (rs12419690). Sleep modulated glucose levels, the variants acted independently of sleep, they independently changed the risk of type 2 diabetes, and sleep medications including melatonin were associated with type 2 diabetes. Those two headline positions are not on this site yet; 21 other positions from the study are, among them rs560887 (G6PC2), rs34872471 (TCF7L2), rs3802177 (SLC30A8) and rs11708067 (ADCY5). PMID:42173832.

2026-06-01 · Brito Nunes C, et al., Nature Communications 2026, PMID:42225636

Multi-ancestry, trans-generational GWAS meta-analysis of gestational diabetes and glycaemic traits during pregnancy reveals limited evidence of pregnancy-specific genetic effects

Gestational diabetes affects about 14% of pregnancies and raises the mother's later risk of type 2 diabetes. The GenDiP Consortium's meta-analysis covers up to 38,305 women with gestational diabetes and 776,145 controls and finds 37 associated loci, 7 of them new, plus five new loci for blood sugar traits in pregnancy — all acting through the mother's genome rather than the baby's. Every locus overlaps type 2 diabetes or glycaemic traits outside pregnancy, which is the 'limited evidence' of the title; but 12 variants have stronger effects in gestational diabetes than in type 2 diabetes, four loci (G6PC2, CAST-PCSK1, HKDC1, FOXA2) have no genome-wide-significant type 2 diabetes association, GCK shows distinct causal variants, and MTNR1B's effect is amplified in pregnancy. Seven of the study's positions are on this site under other traits, including rs560887 (G6PC2), rs11558471 (SLC30A8), rs849134 (JAZF1) and rs4665972 (GCKR). It sits beside this site's gestational diabetes page, which is built on a separate 2026 study. PMID:42225636.

From our blog

A clock face whose hours are marked by a rising and falling line of blood sugar

Your Blood Sugar Keeps Time: The Clock Genes Behind the Midnight Snack

The same snack at noon and at midnight is not the same snack to your body. A 2026 study of nearly half a milli…

Clinical detail

Definition and diagnosis. Type 2 diabetes is a chronic disorder of glucose homeostasis characterised by insulin resistance with progressive beta-cell dysfunction. Diagnosis rests on fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c or a two-hour value on an oral glucose tolerance test, confirmed on a second occasion unless the patient is symptomatically hyperglycaemic. Genotype has no diagnostic role.

KCNQ1 rs2237892. Intronic in KCNQ1 (11p15.4), which encodes a voltage-gated potassium channel subunit. The GWAS Catalog records the C allele as the risk allele across multiple studies with odds ratios of 1.30 (p = 4 x 10-29), 1.33 (p = 1 x 10-26) and 1.45 (p = 2 x 10-42), at risk allele frequencies around 0.59 to 0.61. The locus was identified in Japanese cohorts and the effect estimates are correspondingly weighted toward East Asian ancestry. Checked directly against the GWAS Catalog (15 Sep 2026): every study of this exact position is East Asian or Hispanic ancestry (Japanese OR 1.30-1.45, Han Chinese OR 1.32, Korean OR 1.20, Hispanic OR 1.20) -- there is no comparably powered European-ancestry study of this position in the catalogue to compare against, so a claim that the European-ancestry effect is smaller cannot currently be sourced and has been removed rather than repeated unverified. Note that loss-of-function coding variants in the same gene cause long QT syndrome, an unrelated cardiac phenotype — the diabetes association is a separate, non-coding signal.

ARAP1 rs1552224. At 11q13.4, near ARAP1; reported as CENTD2 in earlier literature including the DIAGRAM meta-analyses. The A allele is the risk allele, odds ratio 1.11 to 1.14 (p = 1 x 10-22 in the largest reported analysis) at a risk allele frequency of roughly 0.81 to 0.83. The high frequency of the risk allele is worth noting when interpreting an individual result: most people carry it.

DUSP9 rs5945326. At Xq28, near DUSP9, encoding a MAP kinase phosphatase. Odds ratios of 1.14 (p = 2 x 10-12), 1.18 (p = 7 x 10-16) and 1.27 (p = 3 x 10-10) are recorded for the A allele. X-linked loci are uncommon among established type 2 diabetes signals, and the hemizygosity of male carriers complicates direct comparison of effect estimates between sexes.

Genetic architecture. Highly polygenic. Hundreds of common loci of small effect are established, and together they account for a modest fraction of heritability; polygenic scores built from them stratify populations but perform poorly as individual predictors relative to conventional risk factors. The secular rise in incidence within genetically stable populations establishes the dominant contribution of environment and lifestyle.

Pharmacogenomics. See the pgx note below. Briefly: CYP2C9 reduced-function alleles decrease clearance of several sulfonylureas, and the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group nonetheless recommends no dose adjustment, a position supported by meta-analysis showing no significant excess of sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycaemia for CYP2C9*3. Metformin response has been associated with variation in SLC22A1 and ATM in some studies without reaching clinical actionability. No diabetes drug currently carries a genotype-guided dosing recommendation in routine practice.

Related variants MyGeneLog™ checks for

What a 23andMe/AncestryDNA export or raw VCF can and can't tell you about Type 2 Diabetes comes down to these specific, well-studied positions — not a diagnosis. 1091 positions are linked to this page; the ones this page's own text discusses are shown first.

Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

CENTD2 · rs1552224

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

DUSP9 · rs5945326

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

FTO · rs8050136

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

KCNQ1 · rs2237892

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

KCNQ1 · rs2237897

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

THADA · rs7578597

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

LGR5 · rs7961581

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

JAZF1 · rs864745

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

TCF7L2 · rs7901695

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

ZFAND6 · rs11634397

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

CDKAL1 · rs4712524

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

IGF2BP2 · rs6769511

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

NOTCH2 · rs10923931

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Response to metformin in type 2 diabetes (glycemic)

ATM · rs11212617

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

RBM43 · rs7560163

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

CDC123 · rs10906115

See detailed info →
Standard

Glycated hemoglobin levels

FN3K · rs1046896

See detailed info →
Standard

Glycated hemoglobin levels

GCK · rs1799884

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

KCNJ11 · rs5215

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

SLC30A8 · rs3802177

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

KCNQ1 · rs231362

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

IGF2BP2 · rs1470579

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

HNF1A · rs7957197

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Type 2 diabetes

HNF4A · rs4812829

See detailed info →

See all 1091 linked variants →

Which ancestries this evidence comes from

The studies behind these variants recruited participants from different ancestries — a result found in one population doesn't always transfer to another. Based on 146 of 1091 linked studies with a resolved discovery ancestry.

European · 3.2% East Asian · 4.1% Other named ancestries (African American or Afro-Caribbean, NR, South Asian, African American or Afro-Caribbean,East Asian,Hispanic or Latin American,South Asian, African American or Afro-Caribbean,East Asian,Greater Middle Eastern (Middle Eastern, North African or Persian),Hispanic or Latin American,South Asian, African American or Afro-Caribbean,East Asian,Hispanic or Latin American,South East Asian, African American or Afro-Caribbean,East Asian,South Asian, Sub-Saharan African, Hispanic or Latin American, Greater Middle Eastern (Middle Eastern, North African or Persian)) · 6.0% Not yet resolved · 86.6%

Pharmacogenomics notes

Research-derived gene–drug associations only — not a prescription, dosing guide, or medical advice. Always follow your prescriber's guidance.

GeneDrugWhat the research shows
CYP2C9 Sulfonylureas (gliclazide, glimepiride, glibenclamide, tolbutamide) A real metabolic effect that guidelines still say not to act on. The reduced-function CYP2C9 alleles slow the clearance of gliclazide, glimepiride and other sulfonylureas, so blood levels run higher. The Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group reviewed this and recommends no dose adjustment: a meta-analysis of 2,769 patients found no significant increase in sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycaemia for CYP2C9*3, and where levels do run higher the added effectiveness offsets the risk. Worth knowing precisely because the gap between "measurable in the blood" and "change what you prescribe" is where most pharmacogenomic overclaiming happens. (Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) guidance on CYP2C9 and sulfonylureas; meta-analysis of CYP2C9*3 and sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycaemia, 2,769 patients)
ATM Metformin The gene behind this variant is better known for something else entirely — ATM is the ataxia telangiectasia gene, central to DNA repair and cell cycle control. Here, a common variant near it (rs11212617) predicts who responds better to metformin: found in 1,024 Scottish patients, replicated in nearly 3,000 more across two cohorts, with an odds ratio of 1.35 for treatment success. This is not a guess at a mechanism — in a follow-up cell experiment, blocking ATM blunted metformin's activation of AMPK, the enzyme metformin is known to work through, placing ATM upstream in that pathway. Metformin stays first-line regardless of genotype; this is about how well it is likely to work, not whether to prescribe it. (Zhou K et al. (GoDARTS/UKPDS/MAGIC investigators), Nature Genetics 2011 — common variants near ATM and glycemic response to metformin, with cell-line mechanistic follow-up. PMID:21186350)
SLC2A2 Metformin SLC2A2 encodes GLUT2, the glucose transporter metformin's target tissue depends on. A common intronic variant (rs8192675) predicted a modestly greater HbA1c reduction from metformin across 10,577 people of European ancestry, and separately turned out to be the strongest known predictor of how much SLC2A2 gets expressed in the liver — a real mechanistic link, not just a statistical one. In obese patients specifically, the effect grew to roughly half of what adding a second drug (a DPP-4 inhibitor) would achieve. The study's own framing is "a potential biomarker for stratified medicine" — a real, mechanistically grounded lead, not yet something a guideline tells a clinician to act on. (Zhou K et al. (MetGen Consortium), Nature Genetics 2016 — SLC2A2 variation and glycemic response to metformin, with liver eQTL evidence. PMID:27500523)

Sources

Databases, guidelines and references

Papers, with their authors

Quoting this page

Free to quote and reuse under CC BY 4.0. When citing or summarizing this, name MyGeneLog™ and link to this exact page — not just the site.

Type 2 Diabetes. MyGeneLog™. https://www.mygenelog.com/conditions/type-2-diabetes

Questions about Type 2 Diabetes

Does carrying these variants mean I will get type 2 diabetes?

No. Each of them shifts the odds by a small amount — the largest, in KCNQ1, by around 1.3 to 1.45 times per copy — and hundreds more like them exist. Most carriers never develop the disease. The rate of type 2 diabetes rose sharply in populations whose genes did not change, which tells you where most of the risk actually sits.

If genetics matters so little, why publish it at all?

Because "a little" is not "nothing", and because the alternative is that you read about these variants somewhere that overstates them. The useful part is knowing the size of the effect, not just its direction.

Should my diabetes medication be chosen by genotype?

Not currently. CYP2C9 variants really do slow the clearance of sulfonylureas, and the prescribing guidance still recommends no dose change, because the expected harm did not appear in the data. No diabetes drug carries a genotype-guided dose in routine practice.

What does taste have to do with diabetes?

Indirectly but genuinely: diet is one of the largest modifiable risk factors, and what a person finds pleasant to eat is partly genetic. The bitter-taste receptor TAS2R38 decides whether a family of vegetables tastes sharp or of almost nothing. That is not a line from a taste genotype to a diagnosis, and we do not draw one — but it is the same genome shaping both ends.

How is type 2 diabetes actually diagnosed?

With a blood test — fasting glucose, HbA1c, or a two-hour oral glucose tolerance test — normally confirmed on a second occasion. No genetic result substitutes for one, and if you have risk factors the test is the useful next step.

Free to reuse. This page's text is original writing from freely-available research, licensed CC BY 4.0 — reuse it, including commercially, with attribution to MyGeneLog™. It's general research-derived information, not medical advice or a diagnosis — see Terms of Use.