443 positions on this site are linked to Glaucoma, out of 103,904 published in total. Each was published only after passing the same quality gate; being on this list is an association, not a diagnosis.
MIR548F3 · rs73111535
See detailed info → StandardADAMTS18 · rs78454115
See detailed info → StandardSLC25A22 · rs4963153
See detailed info → StandardARID5B · rs12778514
See detailed info → StandardLOC171391 · rs4963156
See detailed info → StandardGLIS3 · rs1570204
See detailed info → StandardEXOSC10 · rs534975221
See detailed info → StandardADAMTS18 · rs76953588
See detailed info → StandardPSMC3 · rs9919526
See detailed info → StandardCYP26A1 · rs2797570
See detailed info → StandardAFAP1 · rs6816389
See detailed info → StandardCAV2 · rs10233003
See detailed info → StandardTXNRD2 · rs58714937
See detailed info → StandardBICC1 · rs2393455
See detailed info → StandardNEAT1 · rs12808303
See detailed info → StandardFMNL2 · rs6434068
See detailed info → StandardEXOC2 · rs72835984
See detailed info → StandardPRKAG2 · rs62478245
See detailed info → StandardACOXL · rs3789134
See detailed info → StandardARHGEF12 · rs7126413
See detailed info →Showing 20 of 443 · page 18 of 23
One specific position in the genome (an rsID), explained in plain language with what published research has found it linked to, and how strong that link actually is.
The public GWAS Catalog, checked every twenty minutes, plus variants added manually after research review. Every one passes the same quality gate before publishing.
No. Listing reflects an association from published research, not a diagnosis or a cause. Most common variants shift probability modestly rather than determining an outcome.
Yes — the search box above matches gene symbols and rsIDs as well as trait names.