Cancer

Renal Cell Carcinoma

Reviewed September 11, 2026

The most common kind of kidney cancer in adults. Six risk loci were already known before this study; a large European-ancestry meta-analysis found seven more, five of which are the variants on this page.

What this condition connects to

Renal Cell Carcinoma Variant: rs11813268 rs11813268 Variant Variant: rs4381241 rs4381241 Variant Variant: rs4903064 rs4903064 Variant Variant: rs67311347 rs67311347 Variant Variant: rs74911261 rs74911261 Variant Variant: +19 more +19 more Variant Renal Cell Carcinoma Renal Cell Carcinoma Cancer
Prevalence
The most common kind of kidney cancer in adults. Scelo et al. 2017 combined two new genome-wide scans (5,198 cases, 7,331 controls) with four existing scans, reaching 10,784 cases and 20,406 controls of European ancestry, then tested top signals in a further 3,182 cases and 6,301 controls. The study confirmed six previously known RCC risk loci and found seven new ones; five are the variants on this page (PMID:28598434).
Inheritance
Five common variants, each genome-wide significant in a large European-ancestry meta-analysis, among seven new loci the study identified beyond six already known.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer in adults. Before the study behind this page, six genome-wide risk loci had already been identified for it.

A large meta-analysis, and seven new loci

Scelo et al. 2017 combined two new genome-wide scans (5,198 cases, 7,331 controls) with four existing scans, reaching 10,784 cases and 20,406 controls, all of European ancestry. A further 3,182 cases and 6,301 controls were used to test the top signals. The study confirmed all six previously known RCC risk loci and identified seven new ones.

Five of those seven new loci are the variants on this page: FAF1 (1p32.3, rs4381241, P = 3.1×10⁻¹⁰), ZNF620 (3p22.1, rs67311347, P = 2.5×10⁻⁸), OBFC1 (10q24.33-q25.1, rs11813268, P = 3.9×10⁻⁸), KDELC2 (11q22.3, rs74911261, P = 2.1×10⁻¹⁰) and DPF3 (14q24.2, rs4903064, P = 2.2×10⁻²⁴ — the strongest of the five). The paper used expression quantitative trait analyses — checking whether a variant is statistically linked to how much of a nearby gene gets expressed — to suggest plausible candidate genes at each region; that is a step toward a mechanism, not a proven one, and this page keeps that distinction.

Clinical detail

What is actually diagnosed and treated here

Renal cell carcinoma is diagnosed by imaging and tissue biopsy, not by genotype. Treatment depends on stage — surgery, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy — decided by an oncologist. Nothing on this page changes that.

All five variants here come from the same study, of participants entirely of European ancestry — a scope worth stating rather than assuming these findings generalise to every population. The "candidate genes" the paper's expression analysis points to are plausible starting points for further research, not established drivers of the disease.

Related variants MyGeneLog™ checks for

What a 23andMe/AncestryDNA export or raw VCF can and can't tell you about Renal Cell Carcinoma comes down to these specific, well-studied positions — not a diagnosis.

Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

OBFC1 · rs11813268

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

FAF1 · rs4381241

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

DPF3 · rs4903064

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

ZNF620 · rs67311347

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

KDELC2 · rs74911261

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

BTBD11 · rs78971134

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

near ZBTB42 · rs33925946

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

ZBTB46 · rs932826

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

ZFYVE1 · rs1007934

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

PSEN1 · rs28607501

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

PMF1-BGLAP · rs1052067

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

ARID5B · rs12414509

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

FANCD2 · rs139729777

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

EPAS1 · rs2034327

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

SLC6A13 · rs2053736

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

MYO7B · rs2248661

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

EXO1 · rs3094880

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

near ZFP36L2 · rs4952979

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

DNAJC16 · rs57109480

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

FANCD2 · rs6442146

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

TMEM163 · rs6724777

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

near EPAS1 · rs6739083

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

EPAS1 · rs72797404

See detailed info →
Sensitive

Renal cell carcinoma

EIF1B · rs73073561

See detailed info →

Which ancestries this evidence comes from

The studies behind these variants recruited participants from different ancestries — a result found in one population doesn't always transfer to another. Based on 6 of 24 linked studies with a resolved discovery ancestry.

European · 25.0% Not yet resolved · 75.0%

Sources

Databases, guidelines and references

Papers, with their authors

Questions about Renal Cell Carcinoma

Can these variants diagnose renal cell carcinoma or predict who will get it?

No. RCC is diagnosed by imaging and tissue biopsy. These variants come from a genome-wide association study and are not used diagnostically.

How many risk loci does this add to what was already known?

Seven new loci, on top of six that were already established. This page covers five of the seven new ones.

Do these variants apply to people who are not of European ancestry?

Not established by this study. The discovery meta-analysis and its replication were conducted entirely in participants of European ancestry, so whether these specific loci hold in other populations is an open question.

Does the paper explain how these genes cause kidney cancer?

Not fully. It used expression quantitative trait analysis to suggest plausible candidate genes at each risk region — a step toward a mechanism, showing the variant is linked to gene expression nearby — but does not establish which gene, if any, actually drives the disease.

Free to reuse. This page's text is original writing from freely-available research, licensed CC BY 4.0 — reuse it, including commercially, with attribution to MyGeneLog™. It's general research-derived information, not medical advice or a diagnosis — see Terms of Use.