2 442126262122Reads by AI crawlersClaude0ChatGPT2Google · Gemini1Perplexity2Meta AI6Microsoft · Copilot2Amazon6Apple2China (ByteDance, Huawei, Baidu…)1ByteDance (Doubao)1Others22Total44Counted by the name each crawler declares; requests found to be impersonating one are left out. Google · Gemini includes Googlebot, the search crawler whose index Google also uses for its AI features. Other search engines and bots are under Others.
The most common gynaecological cancer in high-income countries. The largest genetic study of it did not stop at a statistical signal — it showed in the laboratory that the lead variant's region physically touches the promoter of the gene it sits near.
What this condition connects to
Prevalence
A meta-analysis of three genome-wide association studies and two follow-up phases, totalling 7,737 endometrial cancer cases and 37,144 controls of European ancestry, identified five new risk loci, including 13q22.1 near KLF5 and 14q32.33 in AKT1. Functional experiments showed the 13q22.1 region physically interacts with the KLF5 promoter and that a closely linked variant's protective allele suppresses gene expression in vitro (O'Mara et al., Nature Genetics 2016, PMID 27135401).
Inheritance
Common variants, each shifting risk by a fraction. Distinct from Lynch syndrome, a rare, high-penetrance inherited condition caused by mismatch-repair gene mutations that substantially raises both endometrial and colorectal cancer risk and is assessed through clinical genetic testing based on family history.
Endometrial cancer starts in the endometrium, the lining of the uterus, and is the most common cancer of the female reproductive tract in high-income countries. Most cases occur after menopause, and the leading risk factor is prolonged exposure to oestrogen unopposed by progesterone — from obesity, certain hormone therapies, or conditions such as polycystic ovary syndrome.
The largest study, and a rare follow-through
The genetic study behind this page combined three genome-wide association studies and two further follow-up phases, totalling 7,737 endometrial cancer cases and 37,144 controls of European ancestry — the largest genetic study of this cancer at the time. It identified five new risk loci, and this page holds two.
The strongest of the two, rs11841589 at 13q22.1, sits near KLF5, a transcription factor gene already known to matter in the development of the uterus. Rather than stopping at the statistical association, the researchers went further: they showed that the DNA around this locus sits in a region of active chromatin — the open, accessible state DNA takes when it is being used to regulate a gene — and that it physically interacts with the KLF5 promoter region, the switch that turns the gene on. A closely linked variant at the same locus, when carrying its protective version, suppressed KLF5 gene expression in a laboratory test. That is a rare thing for a genome-wide finding to have: not just a position correlated with disease, but direct evidence for what the position does and which gene it reaches.
The second variant, rs2498796 at 14q32.33, sits in AKT1 — a gene at the centre of a cell-growth signalling pathway that is disrupted in many cancers, making its appearance here biologically unsurprising even without the same functional follow-up.
A larger study nearly doubled the count again
O'Mara et al. 2018 expanded the search further still: 12,906 cases against 108,979 controls, roughly double the case count of the study above. It found 9 new loci, doubling the number of known endometrial cancer risk loci at the time. At five of the nine, follow-up analysis identified a likely causal gene; at two of those five, the risk allele lowered expression of a gene that normally restrains cancer-driving cell signaling — a "less braking, more growth signal" mechanism. This page's five variants from that study — rs113998067 (GNL2), rs1740828 (SOX4), rs9668337 (SSPN), rs10850382 (LOC107984437), and rs7981863 (KLF5) — are not the two with that specific mechanistic evidence. rs7981863's gene is worth noting on its own: KLF5 is the same gene rs11841589, above, already discusses in detail. Two independent studies have now each found a separate risk variant near KLF5 for this cancer.
Two suggestive findings, flagged as such
Painter et al. 2018 asked a different question: not "which variants raise endometrial cancer risk," but whether endometrial cancer and endometriosis, a separate condition, share genetic risk factors at all. Using genetic correlation analysis across both diseases' GWAS data, they found a moderate but real correlation, and a cross-disease meta-analysis that flagged 13 loci shared between the two conditions at a suggestive statistical threshold. Only one of those 13, near PTPRD, cleared full genome-wide significance; this page's rs6782972 (RARB) and rs2218868 (OR9Q1) are two of the other twelve — real findings from the same analysis, but below the significance bar every other variant on this page clears. They are included because the same underlying genetic-correlation finding — that endometriosis and endometrial cancer share some biology — is itself the interesting result here, more than either individual locus.
Positions joined since this page was written
What this is The text above discusses the variants this page was written around. Since then the catalogue has joined 2 more positions to it, by shared trait or shared paper. They are listed here by the paper each came from; the text does not describe them, and each variant page carries that study's own record.
The overwhelming majority of endometrial cancer is caught early because it causes a symptom that is hard to ignore: abnormal bleeding, particularly after menopause. That symptom leads to a transvaginal ultrasound and, usually, an endometrial biopsy, which makes the diagnosis. Because of this early presentation, outcomes when caught early are generally good.
The symptom that matters. Any vaginal bleeding after menopause, or irregular bleeding before it, is worth a prompt medical evaluation. It is the single most useful sign for catching this cancer early, and nothing on this page should delay that evaluation.
The much larger genetic factor this page does not cover
A minority of endometrial cancer is caused by Lynch syndrome, an inherited, high-penetrance condition from mutations in DNA mismatch-repair genes that also raises colorectal cancer risk substantially. A strong family history of endometrial or colorectal cancer, especially at a young age, is the signal that leads to testing for Lynch syndrome — a different and far more consequential genetic question than the two common variants on this page.
What this page cannot do
It cannot detect endometrial cancer. Abnormal bleeding, followed by ultrasound and biopsy, is what actually does.
It cannot substitute for Lynch syndrome testing. A relevant family history is assessed separately and is a much stronger risk factor than anything here.
It cannot account for the hormonal and metabolic risk factors that matter most — obesity, unopposed oestrogen exposure, and related conditions.
Related variants MyGeneLog™ checks for
What a 23andMe/AncestryDNA export or raw VCF can and can't tell you about Endometrial Cancer comes down to these specific, well-studied positions — not a diagnosis.
The studies behind these variants recruited participants from different ancestries — a result found in one population doesn't always transfer to another. Based on 9 of 11 linked studies with a resolved discovery ancestry.
63.6%
18.2%
European · 63.6% Other named ancestries (NR) · 18.2% Not yet resolved · 18.2%
Cancer medicine · 2018 · PMID 29608257 · open access
2 442126262122Reads by AI crawlersClaude0ChatGPT2Google · Gemini1Perplexity2Meta AI6Microsoft · Copilot2Amazon6Apple2China (ByteDance, Huawei, Baidu…)1ByteDance (Doubao)1Others22Total44Counted by the name each crawler declares; requests found to be impersonating one are left out. Google · Gemini includes Googlebot, the search crawler whose index Google also uses for its AI features. Other search engines and bots are under Others.
Quoting this page
Free to quote and reuse under CC BY 4.0. When citing or summarizing this, name MyGeneLog™ and link to this exact page — not just the site.
Can a DNA test tell me if I have endometrial cancer?
No. The two variants here each shift risk by a fraction and neither detects the disease. Abnormal bleeding, especially after menopause, followed by ultrasound and biopsy, is how endometrial cancer is actually found — usually early.
What makes the KLF5 finding different from a typical GWAS result?
Most genome-wide findings stop at a statistical correlation between a DNA position and a disease. This one went further: laboratory work showed the region physically contacts the KLF5 gene's promoter and that a linked variant changes how much of the gene gets made. That is direct evidence for a mechanism, not just an association.
I have a family history of endometrial and colorectal cancer. Is this page relevant?
Not directly. That combination is a classic sign of Lynch syndrome, a rare, high-penetrance inherited condition that is a much stronger risk factor than the common variants here. It is worth raising with a doctor and is assessed through separate genetic testing.
What actually raises endometrial cancer risk the most?
Prolonged exposure to oestrogen unopposed by progesterone — from obesity, certain hormone therapies, or conditions like polycystic ovary syndrome — is the dominant risk factor, well ahead of the common genetic variants on this page.
Free to reuse. This page's text is original writing from freely-available research, licensed CC BY 4.0 — reuse it, including commercially, with attribution to MyGeneLog™. It's general research-derived information, not medical advice or a diagnosis — see Terms of Use.