445 positions on this site are linked to Glaucoma, out of 104,198 published in total. Each was published only after passing the same quality gate; being on this list is an association, not a diagnosis.
PARD3B · rs10180371
See detailed info → StandardEXOC2 · rs113985657
See detailed info → StandardC4orf36 · rs1075989
See detailed info → StandardSYN3 · rs5754221
See detailed info → StandardANPEP · rs75149654
See detailed info → StandardOR8H3 · rs61751933
See detailed info → StandardFOLH1 · rs202676
See detailed info → StandardPRTG · rs17819222
See detailed info → StandardCOL8A2 · rs7543855
See detailed info → StandardBABAM2 · rs17006576
See detailed info → StandardKREMEN1 · rs33958791
See detailed info → StandardBABAM2 · rs6741499
See detailed info → StandardLOX · rs2731646
See detailed info → StandardTMEM212-AS1 · rs9832169
See detailed info → StandardGMDS · rs9378671
See detailed info → StandardTMEM212-AS1 · rs3850195
See detailed info → StandardOR4A47 · rs11040204
See detailed info → StandardTHADA · rs77059113
See detailed info → StandardOR4A47 · rs11039798
See detailed info → StandardLRP4 · rs78744550
See detailed info →Showing 20 of 445 · page 16 of 23
One specific position in the genome (an rsID), explained in plain language with what published research has found it linked to, and how strong that link actually is.
The public GWAS Catalog, checked every twenty minutes, plus variants added manually after research review. Every one passes the same quality gate before publishing.
No. Listing reflects an association from published research, not a diagnosis or a cause. Most common variants shift probability modestly rather than determining an outcome.
Yes — the search box above matches gene symbols and rsIDs as well as trait names.