Autoimmune

Myasthenia Gravis

Reviewed September 18, 2026

An autoimmune disease causing fluctuating muscle weakness, and one where genetics turned out to split cleanly by age of onset: the risk locus found in early-onset cases showed no association at all in a later study restricted to people diagnosed after 50.

What this condition connects to

Myasthenia Gravis Variant: rs3130544 rs3130544 Variant Variant: rs111945767 rs111945767 Variant Variant: rs2853986 rs2853986 Variant Variant: rs1264706 rs1264706 Variant Variant: rs3093958 rs3093958 Variant Myasthenia Gravis Myasthenia Gravis Autoimmune
Prevalence
A GWAS of 649 early-onset, antibody-positive myasthenia gravis cases found risk mapping to HLA-B*08 and a TNIP1 coding variant (Gregersen et al., Annals of Neurology 2012, PMID 23055271). A separate GWAS restricted to 532 late-onset (age 50+) cases against 2,128 controls confirmed TNFRSF11A, found a new ZBTB10 locus, and identified three independent HLA associations -- while finding no association at all for the early-onset TNIP1 signal (Seldin et al., Molecular Medicine 2015, PMID 26562150).
Inheritance
Common variants, each shifting risk modestly, concentrated in immune-related regions (HLA/MHC) as expected for an antibody-driven autoimmune disease. The genetic architecture differs meaningfully between early-onset and late-onset disease, evidenced directly by the early-onset TNIP1 signal failing to replicate in the late-onset study.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease in which antibodies attack the connection between nerve and muscle, causing fluctuating weakness that characteristically worsens with activity and improves with rest -- often first noticed in the eyes (drooping eyelids, double vision) before spreading more widely. It is rare, but well understood immunologically, which made it a good candidate for genome-wide study.

Two studies, two ages of onset, two different genetic pictures

The first study behind this page examined 649 North European early-onset MG cases, finding that risk mapped most strongly to HLA-B*08 and to a specific coding change in TNIP1 (Pro151Ala) -- the finding is right in the paper's own title. rs3130544, catalogued here in the MHC class I region, reflects that finding.

A second, later study restricted specifically to late-onset MG -- 532 cases diagnosed at age 50 or older, antibody-positive, against 2,128 controls -- confirmed an earlier TNFRSF11A association, found a new genome-wide-significant locus in ZBTB10, and identified three independent HLA associations of its own. rs111945767, catalogued here in the MHC class II region, reflects this late-onset-specific finding. Tellingly, the early-onset study's TNIP1 signal showed no association at all in this late-onset cohort -- direct evidence that early-onset and late-onset MG, despite sharing a name and a clinical picture, are genetically distinct diseases rather than two severities of one disease.

Positions joined since this page was written

What this is The text above discusses the variants this page was written around. Since then the catalogue has joined 3 more positions to it, by shared trait or shared paper. They are listed here by the paper each came from; the text does not describe them, and each variant page carries that study's own record.

Braun A et al. 2024, Nature communications rs2853986 (near RNU6-283P), rs1264706 (near TRIM31-AS1) — PMID:39537604

Chia R et al. 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America rs3093958 (LINC01149) — PMID:35074870

Clinical detail

What actually diagnoses and manages this

Myasthenia gravis is diagnosed by a combination of clinical exam, a blood test for acetylcholine-receptor (or related) antibodies, and electrophysiological testing -- not by genotype. It is treated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, immunosuppressive therapy, and in some cases thymectomy or newer targeted biologics, managed by a neurologist.

Age of onset changes the genetics, not just the age. The variant most relevant to a case depends on whether it is early- or late-onset MG -- the two studies behind this page found substantially different loci, and one confirmed the other's main early-onset signal does not apply to late-onset cases at all.

What this page cannot do

  • It cannot diagnose myasthenia gravis. Antibody testing and electrophysiology do that.
  • It cannot say which age-of-onset subtype a genotype points to. These are population-level findings from two separately recruited cohorts, not an individual classifier.
  • It does not cover the full genetic picture. Later, larger meta-analyses (not yet reflected here) have since found further loci in both subtypes.

Related variants MyGeneLog™ checks for

What a 23andMe/AncestryDNA export or raw VCF can and can't tell you about Myasthenia Gravis comes down to these specific, well-studied positions — not a diagnosis.

Standard

Myasthenia gravis

MHC class I region · rs3130544

See detailed info →
Standard

Late-onset myasthenia gravis

MHC_Class II · rs111945767

See detailed info →
Standard

Early-onset myasthenia gravis

near RNU6-283P · rs2853986

See detailed info →
Standard

Myasthenia gravis

near TRIM31-AS1 · rs1264706

See detailed info →
Standard

Early-onset myasthenia gravis

LINC01149 · rs3093958

See detailed info →

Which ancestries this evidence comes from

The studies behind these variants recruited participants from different ancestries — a result found in one population doesn't always transfer to another. Based on 2 of 5 linked studies with a resolved discovery ancestry.

European · 40.0% Not yet resolved · 60.0%

Sources

Databases, guidelines and references

Papers, with their authors

Quoting this page

Free to quote and reuse under CC BY 4.0. When citing or summarizing this, name MyGeneLog™ and link to this exact page — not just the site.

Myasthenia Gravis. MyGeneLog™. https://www.mygenelog.com/conditions/myasthenia-gravis

Questions about Myasthenia Gravis

Are early-onset and late-onset myasthenia gravis the same disease genetically?

No. The two studies behind this page found substantially different risk loci, and the late-onset study specifically found no association at all for the early-onset study's main TNIP1 signal -- real evidence the two are genetically distinct, despite the shared name and clinical picture.

Can this catalogue diagnose myasthenia gravis or predict its severity?

No. Diagnosis relies on antibody blood tests and electrophysiological testing, not genotype -- and neither variant here predicts an individual's course.

How is myasthenia gravis actually treated?

With acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, immunosuppressive therapy, and in some cases thymectomy or targeted biologics, managed by a neurologist.

Free to reuse. This page's text is original writing from freely-available research, licensed CC BY 4.0 — reuse it, including commercially, with attribution to MyGeneLog™. It's general research-derived information, not medical advice or a diagnosis — see Terms of Use.