95 positions on this site are linked to Myopia, out of 9,061 published in total. Each was published only after passing the same quality gate; being on this list is an association, not a diagnosis.
CYP26A1 · rs17382981
See detailed info → StandardLOC100508120 · rs10458138
See detailed info → StandardMETTL15 · rs511217
See detailed info → StandardRALY · rs1555075
See detailed info → StandardRCBTB1 · rs1359543
See detailed info → StandardRBFOX1 · rs79266634
See detailed info → StandardVIPR2 · rs60884546
See detailed info → StandardTMC3 · rs1969091
See detailed info → StandardST8SIA1 · rs117735470
See detailed info → StandardMAF · rs56055503
See detailed info → StandardTCF7L2 · rs72826094
See detailed info → StandardRNLS · rs11202736
See detailed info → StandardPTPRR · rs11178469
See detailed info → StandardLINC00340 · rs1207782
See detailed info → StandardDSCAML1 · rs7122817
See detailed info → StandardNRIP1 · rs11088317
See detailed info → StandardTFAP2D · rs9395623
See detailed info → StandardC4orf22 · rs7692381
See detailed info → StandardHAT1 · rs17428076
See detailed info → StandardSNORA51 · rs72655575
See detailed info →Showing 20 of 95 · page 2 of 5
One specific position in the genome (an rsID), explained in plain language with what published research has found it linked to, and how strong that link actually is.
The public GWAS Catalog, checked every twenty minutes, plus variants added manually after research review. Every one passes the same quality gate before publishing.
No. Listing reflects an association from published research, not a diagnosis or a cause. Most common variants shift probability modestly rather than determining an outcome.
Yes — the search box above matches gene symbols and rsIDs as well as trait names.