For researchers

Is your paper here?

2,673 papers hold this site up. Every variant and condition page names the research it was written from, and this is that list, gathered from the pages themselves. Search your name, your journal, or a PMID.

10 matches for Christensen C.

Protein-altering variants associated with body mass index implicate pathways that control energy intake and expenditure in obesity
CHD Exome+ Consortium · EPIC-CVD Consortium and 9 more consortia
Nature genetics · 2018 · PMID 29273807 · open access
12 pages+
rs2277598 rs295322 rs62623713 rs11555762 rs9891146 rs13447324
Fine-mapping type 2 diabetes loci to single-variant resolution using high-density imputation and islet-specific epigenome maps
Nature genetics · 2018 · PMID 30297969
12 pages+
rs234853 rs184509201 rs3772071 rs11699802 rs231349 rs35913461
Protein-coding variants implicate novel genes related to lipid homeostasis contributing to body-fat distribution
CHD Exome+ Consortium · Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium and 8 more consortia
Nature genetics · 2019 · PMID 30778226 · open access
12 pages+
rs10494217 rs1051860 rs141845046 rs145878042 rs1715919 rs62266958
Discovery of rare variants associated with blood pressure regulation through meta-analysis of 1.3 million individuals
LifeLines Cohort Study · EPIC-CVD and 3 more consortia
Nature genetics · 2020 · PMID 33230300 · open access
12 pages+
rs184289122 rs149165710 rs145441283 rs187207161 rs767105335 rs77357563
Trans-ancestry meta-analyses identify rare and common variants associated with blood pressure and hypertension
CHARGE-Heart Failure Consortium · EchoGen Consortium and 12 more consortia
Nature genetics · 2016 · PMID 27618447 · open access
11 pages
rs16982520 rs7406910 rs34591516 rs1126930 rs10407022 rs470113
Exome-wide association study of plasma lipids in >300,000 individuals
Charge Diabetes Working Group · EPIC-InterAct Consortium and 3 more consortia
Nature genetics · 2017 · PMID 29083408 · open access
11 pages
rs10861661 rs201596848 rs900399 rs7157785 rs3927680 rs7946
Genome-wide association studies in the Japanese population identify seven novel loci for type 2 diabetes
Nature communications · 2016 · PMID 26818947 · open access
6 pages
rs78627331 rs1116357 rs1575972 rs9309245 rs67156297 rs7107784
Refining the accuracy of validated target identification through coding variant fine-mapping in type 2 diabetes
ExomeBP Consortium · MAGIC Consortium and 1 more consortia
Nature genetics · 2018 · PMID 29632382 · open access
6 pages
rs16826069 rs1127787 rs7572857 rs2233580 rs56200889 rs35658696
Re-analysis of public genetic data reveals a rare X-chromosomal variant associated with type 2 diabetes
Nature communications · 2018 · PMID 29358691 · open access
4 pages
rs1708302 rs2943656 rs71320321 rs115918645
A Genome-Wide Association Study of Diabetic Kidney Disease in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study (FinnDiane) · Hong Kong Diabetes Registry Theme-based Research Scheme Project Group and 4 more consortia
Diabetes · 2018 · PMID 29703844
1 page
rs9942471

Questions about this list

Why is my paper here? I never gave you permission.

Nothing of your paper is reproduced here. This page records that a MyGeneLog™ page cites your work, and links to the paper on PubMed — which is what a citation is. Your title and author list come from Europe PMC, the same public record a library catalogue uses.

Why are all the authors listed instead of "et al."?

Because a study that needed 622 people is a different kind of study from one that needed four, and "et al." erases that. Twelve names show and the rest are one click away. Everyone is searchable, including the 187th name on a consortium paper — that person exists and may be looking for it.

My name is misspelt, or the paper is wrong.

Tell us and it is fixed. Names come from the public record and initials are inconsistent across databases; where two people share a form of a name we cannot separate them, and we would rather be corrected than guess.

My paper is not here. Does that mean you rejected it?

No. This catalogue is assembled from what a small team could read, and it is thinnest outside European-ancestry cohorts. A paper is absent because nobody has got to it, not because it was assessed and turned down.

Which pages rest on a paper?

Each row lists them, up to six, and links to each one. The count beside a row is how many pages cite it in total.

How often does this change?

It is rebuilt from the pages every hour. A paper appears the moment a page starts resting on it and disappears if that page stops — there is no separate list to keep in step, because the citation lives on the page that makes the claim.