152 positions on this site are linked to Adventurousness, out of 64,425 published in total. Each was published only after passing the same quality gate; being on this list is an association, not a diagnosis.
C17orf58 · rs6504568
See detailed info → StandardFOXP1 · rs13093086
See detailed info → StandardBCL11A · rs7560588
See detailed info → StandardZBED9 · rs6908726
See detailed info → StandardPPA2 · rs2647256
See detailed info → StandardLRP8 · rs17785382
See detailed info → StandardTCF4 · rs72930774
See detailed info → StandardCYP7B1 · rs62519841
See detailed info → StandardTCF4 · rs1531518
See detailed info → StandardDNAJB1 · rs112878517
See detailed info → StandardEFNA4 · rs11589479
See detailed info → StandardKIF16B · rs6131703
See detailed info → StandardNLGN1 · rs963349
See detailed info → StandardGABRB1 · rs13116355
See detailed info → StandardTAC1 · rs6465607
See detailed info → StandardSATB1 · rs13090941
See detailed info → StandardCADM2 · rs73130739
See detailed info → StandardL3MBTL2 · rs77339131
See detailed info → StandardCADM2 · rs67379620
See detailed info → StandardCADM2 · rs116275905
See detailed info →Showing 20 of 152 · page 6 of 8
One specific position in the genome (an rsID), explained in plain language with what published research has found it linked to, and how strong that link actually is.
The public GWAS Catalog, checked every twenty minutes, plus variants added manually after research review. Every one passes the same quality gate before publishing.
No. Listing reflects an association from published research, not a diagnosis or a cause. Most common variants shift probability modestly rather than determining an outcome.
Yes — the search box above matches gene symbols and rsIDs as well as trait names.