152 positions on this site are linked to Adventurousness, out of 64,173 published in total. Each was published only after passing the same quality gate; being on this list is an association, not a diagnosis.
OLFM1 · rs28647734
See detailed info → StandardCA10 · rs12600773
See detailed info → StandardIGSF11 · rs13065007
See detailed info → StandardACO1 · rs10970595
See detailed info → StandardSEMA6D · rs1486900
See detailed info → StandardRMI1 · rs10780649
See detailed info → StandardNEGR1 · rs1775370
See detailed info → StandardFANCL · rs17049905
See detailed info → StandardCABP1 · rs1109480
See detailed info → StandardTYRP1 · rs1931386
See detailed info → StandardCPSF6 · rs479971
See detailed info → StandardZEB2 · rs10928235
See detailed info → StandardADGRB2 · rs4949465
See detailed info → StandardRPEL1 · rs1628768
See detailed info → StandardGGACT · rs3783177
See detailed info → StandardSCOC · rs17373738
See detailed info → StandardCA10 · rs1825734
See detailed info → StandardVGLL3 · rs2324999
See detailed info → StandardOR5A2 · rs12787182
See detailed info → StandardSDK1 · rs1108879
See detailed info →Showing 20 of 152 · page 3 of 8
One specific position in the genome (an rsID), explained in plain language with what published research has found it linked to, and how strong that link actually is.
The public GWAS Catalog, checked every twenty minutes, plus variants added manually after research review. Every one passes the same quality gate before publishing.
No. Listing reflects an association from published research, not a diagnosis or a cause. Most common variants shift probability modestly rather than determining an outcome.
Yes — the search box above matches gene symbols and rsIDs as well as trait names.