0 1726225Reads by AI crawlersClaude0ChatGPT0Google · Gemini2Perplexity0Meta AI0Microsoft · Copilot6Amazon2Apple2China (ByteDance, Huawei, Baidu…)0Others5Total17Counted by the name each crawler declares; requests found to be impersonating one are left out. Google · Gemini includes Googlebot, the search crawler whose index Google also uses for its AI features. Other search engines and bots are under Others.
Stands on its own.
Nothing else here links to this position yet — but the page above is the point: what the
research found, what each genotype means, and where it came from, in language you can
read. Links to conditions, drugs and the senses appear automatically if we write them.
Strength of the evidence
1 / 4
Its strongest genetic-study result is p = 10−15, with 3 associations in the GWAS Catalog.
How this is scored
4: ClinVar disease-causing, reviewed by an expert panel or a guideline (3–4 stars). 3: ClinVar, several labs agreeing (2 stars), or a genetic study at p ≤ 10−50. 2: ClinVar from one lab (1 star), or p ≤ 10−20. 1: ClinVar submitted without criteria (0 stars), or genome-wide significance (p ≤ 5×10−8). The higher of the two counts. It says how solid the evidence is, not whether it matters for a particular person.
What the study found
Who was studied 171,771 European ancestry individuals.
The effect
Each copy of the T allele shifted the measure 0.0331 lower (95% confidence interval 0.025-0.041); p = 1 × 10−15.
How common The T allele had a frequency of about 26% in the people studied.
Where it sits Chromosome 19, band 19q13.32 — in an intron of EXOC3L2.
What each result means
A/ANo copy of the version the research linked to Sum eosinophil basophil counts. This is the starting point the study compared everyone against.
A/TOne copy of the version the research linked to Sum eosinophil basophil counts. That is a smaller link than two copies.
T/TTwo copies of the version the research linked to Sum eosinophil basophil counts. That is the strongest link of the three results. A link in a study is not a diagnosis.
rs11669910 is a single position in the genome, in or near the MARK4 gene. Published research associates it with sum eosinophil basophil counts. A single variant does not decide an outcome — it shifts a probability, and for most common variants the shift is small.
Does having rs11669910 mean I will get this?
No. Common variants like this one move a probability slightly and, on their own, rarely decide anything about one person. Nothing on this page is a diagnosis, and health decisions should be made with a clinician who can see your whole picture.
Where does the information about rs11669910 come from?
GWAS Catalog, Cell 2016, PMID:27863252. Every variant on MyGeneLog comes from public primary sources and is published with its citation and the date it was checked.
0 1726225Reads by AI crawlersClaude0ChatGPT0Google · Gemini2Perplexity0Meta AI0Microsoft · Copilot6Amazon2Apple2China (ByteDance, Huawei, Baidu…)0Others5Total17Counted by the name each crawler declares; requests found to be impersonating one are left out. Google · Gemini includes Googlebot, the search crawler whose index Google also uses for its AI features. Other search engines and bots are under Others.
Quoting this page
Licensed CC BY-NC 4.0: free to read, share and adapt for non-commercial use, naming MyGeneLog™ and linking the exact page. Commercial use, including training or serving a commercial AI system, needs a licence — https://www.mygenelog.com/license
Sum eosinophil basophil counts (rs11669910). MyGeneLog™. https://www.mygenelog.com/variants/rs11669910