Standard

Refractive error

near ERLIN1 · rs10883448

Stands on its own. Nothing else here links to this position yet — but the page above is the point: what the research found, what each genotype means, and where it came from, in language you can read. Links to conditions, drugs and the senses appear automatically if we write them.

Strength of the evidence

1 / 4

Its strongest genetic-study result is p = 10⁻⁸, with 1 associations in the GWAS Catalog.

How this is scored

4: ClinVar disease-causing, reviewed by an expert panel or a guideline (3–4 stars). 3: ClinVar, several labs agreeing (2 stars), or a genetic study at p ≤ 10⁻⁵⁰. 2: ClinVar from one lab (1 star), or p ≤ 10⁻²⁰. 1: ClinVar submitted without criteria (0 stars), or genome-wide significance (p ≤ 5×10⁻⁸). The higher of the two counts. It says how solid the evidence is, not whether it matters for a particular person.

What the study found

Who was studied 1,495,159 European ancestry individuals.

The effect Each copy of the A allele shifted the measure 0.009 SD unit lower (95% confidence interval 0.006-0.012); p = 7 × 10⁻⁹.

How common The A allele had a frequency of about 38% in the people studied.

Where it sits Chromosome 10, band 10q24.31 — between genes, 0.6 kb from SPCS2P2.

How common each version is

AG

Korean KRGDB

A 15.7% · G 84.3%

Korean Korea4K

A 14.9% · G 85.1%

Japanese ToMMo

A 13.3% · G 86.7%

Vietnamese

A 15.7% · G 84.3%

World gnomAD

A 39.2% · G 60.8%

World 1000 Genomes

A 31.8% · G 68.2%

World TOPMed

A 40.3% · G 59.7%

The share of all copies of this position that are each version. Source: the population studies published in dbSNP (US NCBI); each row names its study.

What each result means

A/A Two copies of the version the research linked to Refractive error. That is the strongest link of the three results. A link in a study is not a diagnosis.

A/G One copy of the version the research linked to Refractive error. That is a smaller link than two copies.

G/G No copy of the version the research linked to Refractive error. This is the starting point the study compared everyone against.

Source

Multi-ancestry genome-wide association analyses of refractive error augment genetic discovery and polygenic prediction

Cheng FF, Liu X, Mi H, Wang L, Ma R, Guo Y, Sidorenko J, Jiang C, Islam T, Meguro A, Hikino K, Ishikawa Y

and 15 more — show all

Tang S, Li T, Chen R, Wang L, Mägi R, Metspalu A, Takeuchi M, Mizuki N, Choquet H, Jin ZB, Chen G, Zhou K, Terao C, Zeng J, Yang J

Estonian Biobank Research Team · 23andMe Research Team

Nature genetics · 2026 · PMID 42009823 · open access

Quoting this page

Licensed CC BY-NC 4.0: free to read, share and adapt for non-commercial use, naming MyGeneLog™ and linking the exact page. Commercial use, including training or serving a commercial AI system, needs a licence — https://www.mygenelog.com/license

Refractive error (rs10883448). MyGeneLog™. https://www.mygenelog.com/variants/rs10883448

← See all variants