Links from this page to related variants, conditions, drugs and topics are not included for automated readers. Those connections are the Gene Knowledge Graph and are licensed as data: https://www.mygenelog.com/license

Standard

Refractive error

IGF1R · rs2684786

Strength of the evidence

1 / 4

Its strongest genetic-study result is p = 10−7, with 1 associations in the GWAS Catalog.

How this is scored

4: ClinVar disease-causing, reviewed by an expert panel or a guideline (3–4 stars). 3: ClinVar, several labs agreeing (2 stars), or a genetic study at p ≤ 10−50. 2: ClinVar from one lab (1 star), or p ≤ 10−20. 1: ClinVar submitted without criteria (0 stars), or genome-wide significance (p ≤ 5×10−8). The higher of the two counts. It says how solid the evidence is, not whether it matters for a particular person.

What the study found

Who was studied 1,495,159 European ancestry individuals.

The effect Each copy of the T allele shifted the measure 0.00974 SD unit higher (95% confidence interval 0.0063-0.0132); p = 4 × 10−8.

How common The T allele had a frequency of about 24% in the people studied.

Where it sits Chromosome 15, band 15q26.3 — in the 3′ untranslated region of IGF1R.

What ClinVar records

Classification Benign for Growth delay due to insulin-like growth factor I resistance; criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts (2 of 4 stars, 2 submitters), last evaluated 2018-01-13. ClinVar record 317592 NM_000875.5(IGF1R):c.*4814C>T

Change history MyGeneLog™ keeps a copy of every weekly release from 2026-10-19 and compares them. This position's classification has not changed since.

What this is ClinVar's aggregate record for this position (as of its 2026-11-09 release), not a result about you. A classification describes the variant against the condition named, as laboratories submitted it. Whether a person carries this variant, and what that would mean for them, is a question for a clinical test and a genetic counsellor.

How common each version is

CT
Korean KRGDB
C 95.6% · T 4.4%
Korean Korea4K
C 96.4% · T 3.6%
Korean Korea1K
C 96.7% · T 3.3%
Japanese ToMMo
C 96.5% · T 3.5%
Vietnamese
C 95.2% · T 4.8%
World gnomAD
C 81.8% · T 18.2%
World 1000 Genomes
C 89.6% · T 10.4%
World TOPMed
C 82.2% · T 17.8%

By ancestry gnomAD

East Asian
C 95.8% · T 4.3%
European (non-Finnish)
C 75.8% · T 24.2%
African / African American
C 89.4% · T 10.6%
South Asian
C 92.0% · T 8.0%
Admixed American (Latino)
C 83.0% · T 17.0%
Middle Eastern
C 86.7% · T 13.3%
Finnish
C 76.4% · T 23.6%
Ashkenazi Jewish
C 83.2% · T 16.8%

The share of all copies of this position that are each version. Source: the population studies published in dbSNP (US NCBI); each row names its study. The ancestry rows are gnomAD's own groups (via Ensembl), as the survey defines them, not races.

What each result means

C/C No copy of the version the research linked to Refractive error. This is the starting point the study compared everyone against.
C/T One copy of the version the research linked to Refractive error. That is a smaller link than two copies.
T/T Two copies of the version the research linked to Refractive error. That is the strongest link of the three results. A link in a study is not a diagnosis.
Source

Quoting this page

Licensed CC BY-NC 4.0: free to read, share and adapt for non-commercial use, naming MyGeneLog™ and linking the exact page. Commercial use, including training or serving a commercial AI system, needs a licence — https://www.mygenelog.com/license

Refractive error (rs2684786). MyGeneLog™. https://www.mygenelog.com/variants/rs2684786

← See all variants